Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:13:34.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Automatic modification retrieval between CADparts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2010

Khaled Souaissa ,
Jean-Christophe Cuillière ,
Vincent François ,
Abdelmajid Benamara  and
Hedi BelHadjSalah
Khaled Souaissa
Affiliation:
ERICCA, Département de Génie Mécanique UQTR, Trois Rivières, Canada, G9A 5H7 LGM, ENIM, Monastir, Tunisia
Jean-Christophe Cuillière
Affiliation:
ERICCA, Département de Génie Mécanique UQTR, Trois Rivières, Canada, G9A 5H7
Vincent François*
Affiliation:
ERICCA, Département de Génie Mécanique UQTR, Trois Rivières, Canada, G9A 5H7
Abdelmajid Benamara
Affiliation:
LGM, ENIM, Monastir, Tunisia
Hedi BelHadjSalah
Affiliation:
LGM, ENIM, Monastir, Tunisia
*
aCorresponding author:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Several research works have been focused on integrating FEA (finite-elements analysis)with CAD (Computer Aided Design) over the last decade. In spite of the improvementsbrought by this integration, research work remains to be done in order to better integrateall the operations led during the design process. Until now, the communication between CADmodules remains static. The design process involves several modifications of an initialdesign solution. Consequently, there is a need for more flexible communications betweenCAD modules through the design cycle. Some approaches have been developed in order toreduce the design process length when using FEA, and to automate the transfer of part’sdata from one step of the process to the next one. Automatic re-meshing is one of theseapproaches and it is based on automatically updating the part’s mesh around modificationszones, in the case of a minor change in the part’s design, without the need to re-mesh theentire part. The purpose of this paper is presenting a new tool, aiming at the improvementof automatic re-meshing procedures. It basically consists in automatically identifying andlocating modifications between two CAD parts (typically an initial design and a modifieddesign). A major benefit of the approach presented here is that it is completelyindependent of the description frame, which is made possible with the use of vector-basedgeometric representations.

Keywords

Geometric comparisonBREPvectorial spaceremeshNURBSComparaison de géométrieBREPvectorisationremaillageNURBS
Type
Research Article
Information
Mechanics & Industry , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , March 2010 , pp. 85 - 92
Copyright
© AFM, EDP Sciences 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cardone, A., Gupta, S.K., Karnik, M., A Survey of Shape Similarity Assessment Algorithms for Product Design and Manufacturing Applications, J. Compu. Inf. Sci. Eng. 3 (2003) 109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyer, N., Jayanti, S., Lou, K., Kalyanaraman, Y., Ramani, K., Three-dimensional shape searching: state-of-the-art review and future trends, Comput. Aided Des. 37 (2005) 509–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, T., Lee, K., Kim, S., Chu, C., Lee, H., Similarity comparison of mechanical parts, Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2 (2005) 759–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Hilaga, Y. Shinagawa, T. Kohmura, T.L. Kunii, Topology Matching for Fully Automatic Similarity Estimation of 3D Shapes SIGGRAPH. Los Angeles, 2001, pp. 203–212
Osada, R., Funkhouser, T., Chazelle, B., Dobkin, D., Shape distributions, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21 (2002) 807–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R. Osada, T.A. Funkhouser, B. Chazelle, D.P. Dobkin, Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions, Shape Modeling International, IEEE Computer Society, 2001, pp. 154–166
R. Ohbuchi, T. Minamitani, T. Takei, Shape-Similarity Search of 3D Models by using Enhanced Shape Functions, TPCG, 2003, pp. 97–104
D. Vranic, D. Saupe, J. Richter, Tools for 3D-Object Retrieval: Karhunen-Loeve Transform and Spherical Harmonics, IEEE Fourth Workshop on multimedia signal processing, Cannes, France, 2001, pp. 293–298
D. Saupe, D.V. Vranic, 3D model retrieval with spherical harmonics and moments, DAGM, 2001, pp. 392–397
V.A. Cicirello, Intelligent Retrieval of Solid Models, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 1999
V.A. Cicirello, W.C. Regli, Machining Feature-Based Comparisons of Mechanical Parts, Shape Modeling International, 2001, p. 176
Ramesh, M., Yip-Hoi, D., Dutta, D., Feature Based Shape Similarity Measurement for Retrieval of Mechanical Parts, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 1 (2001) 245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francois, V., Cuilliere, J.-C., 3D Automatic remeshing applied to model modification, Comput. Aided Des. 32 (2000) 433–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francois, V., Cuilliere, J.-C., Automatic mesh pre-optimization based on the geometric discretization error, Adv. Eng. Softw. 31 (2000) 763–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Serre, A. Riviere, A. Clement, Geometric Product Specification and Verification: Integration of Functionality: Analysis of fonctional geometrical specification, Kluwer, 2003, pp. 115–125
P. Serre, A. Riviere, A. Clement, The clearence effect for assemblability of over-contrained mechanism, 8th CIRP International Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Charlotte (USA), 2003
A. Clement, A. Riviere, P. Serre, Geometry and topology declarative: a new paradigme for CAD/CAM systems, IDMME. Compiègne, France, 1998, pp. 587–595
A. Clement, A. Riviere, P. Serre, C. Valade, The TTRS: 13 Constraints for Dimensionning and Tolerancing, 5th CIRPP International Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Toronto, Canada, 1997
L.A. Piegl, W. Tiller, The NURBS book, 1997
M.E. Mortenson, Geometric Modeling, 1985