Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T14:50:34.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primary decompositions of torsion modules over domains

Part of: Theory of modules and ideals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Laszlo Fuchs  and
Sang Bum Lee
Laszlo Fuchs
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]
Sang Bum Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Education, Sang Myung University, Seoul 110-743, Korea.
Get access

Extract

In what follows, R will denote a commutative domain with 1, and Q(≠R) its field of quotients, which is viewed here as an R-module. By RP we denote the localization of R at the maximal ideal P, and more generally, by MP = Rp⊗RM the localization of the R-module M at P, which we define to be the P-component of M. The symbol R* will mean the multiplicative monoid of nonzero elements of R. For a submonoid S of R*, Rs will denote the localization of R at S.

MSC classification

Secondary: 13C13: Other special types
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematika , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , June 1997 , pp. 88 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Fuchs, L. and Lee, S. B.. Primary decompositions over domains. Glasgow Math. J., 38 (1996), 321–326.Google Scholar
2.Heinzer, W. and Ohm, J.. Locally Noetherian commutative rings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 178 (1971), 173–184.Google Scholar
3.Jaffard, P.. Les systèmes d'idéaux. Travaux et Recherches Mathématiques. IV (Dunod, Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
4.Matlis, E.. Cotorsion modules. Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc., 49 (1964).Google Scholar
5.Richman, F.. Generalized quotient rings. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 16 (1965), 794–799.Google Scholar