Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:43:15.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimal length functions on groups

Part of: Structure and classification of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

David L. Wilkens
David L. Wilkens
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham. B15 2TT
Get access

Extract

In Theorem 7.13 of [1], Proposition 3.1 of [5], and Theorem 1 of [10], minimal group actions on R-trees are considered. If a group G acts on a tree T, then a Lyndon length function lu is associated with each point u∈T. Abstract minimal length functions are defined in Section 2 of this paper by a simple reduction process, where lengths of elements are reduced by a fixed amount (except that any length must remain non-negative). It is shown in Theorem 2.3 that minimal length functions correspond to minimal actions by following Chiswell's construction of actions on trees from length functions, given in [4]. A parallel result to Theorem 1 of [10] is given for minimal length functions in Theorem 2.2. One outcome of these results is that to determine which length functions can arise from an action of a group on the same tree, it suffices to consider only minimal length functions. Section 1 is concerned with some preparatory properties on lengths of products of elements. These lead in Proposition 1.6 to an alternative description of the maximal trivializable subgroup associated with a length function, defined in [3].

MSC classification

Secondary: 20E08: Groups acting on trees
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematika , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , June 1992 , pp. 56 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Alperin, Roger and Bass, Hyman. Length functions of group actions on Λ-trees. In Combinatorial Group Theory and Topology (Alta, Utah, 1984, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton N.J., 1987), 265–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Alperin, Roger C. and Moss, Kenneth N.. Complete trees for groups with a real-valued length function. J. London Math. Soc. (2), 31 (1985), 55–68.Google Scholar
3.Chapman, G. R. and Wilkens, D. L.. On length functions, trivializable subgroups and centres of groups. Michigan Math. J., 30 (1983), 165–173.Google Scholar
4.Chiswell, I. M.. Abstract length functions in groups. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 80 (1976), 451–463.Google Scholar
5.Culler, Marc and Morgan, John W.. Group actions on R-trees. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 55 (1987), 571–604.Google Scholar
6.Lyndon, Roger C.. Length functions in groups. Math. Scand., 12 (1963), 209–234.Google Scholar
7.Wilkens, David L.. On non-Archimedean lengths in groups. Mathematika, 23 (1976), 57–61.Google Scholar
8.Wilkens, David L.. Length functions and normal subgroups. J. London Math. Soc. (2), 22 (1980), 439–448.Google Scholar
9.Wilkens, David L.. Invariants and examples of group actions on trees and length functions. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2), 34 (1991), 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Wilkens, David L.. Group actions on trees with and without fixed points. To appear in Discrete Groups and Geometry, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, No. 173 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar