Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:31:19.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bitopological duality for distributive lattices and Heyting algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

GURAM BEZHANISHVILI ,
NICK BEZHANISHVILI ,
DAVID GABELAIA  and
ALEXANDER KURZ
GURAM BEZHANISHVILI
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces NM 88003-8001, U.S.A. Email: [email protected]
NICK BEZHANISHVILI
Affiliation:
Department of Computing, Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2AZ, U.K. Email:[email protected]
DAVID GABELAIA
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Logic, Razmadze Mathematical Institute, M. Aleksidze Str. 1, Tbilisi 0193, Georgia Email: [email protected]
ALEXANDER KURZ
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We introduce pairwise Stone spaces as a bitopological generalisation of Stone spaces – the duals of Boolean algebras – and show that they are exactly the bitopological duals of bounded distributive lattices. The category PStone of pairwise Stone spaces is isomorphic to the category Spec of spectral spaces and to the category Pries of Priestley spaces. In fact, the isomorphism of Spec and Pries is most naturally seen through PStone by first establishing that Pries is isomorphic to PStone, and then showing that PStone is isomorphic to Spec. We provide the bitopological and spectral descriptions of many algebraic concepts important in the study of distributive lattices. We also give new bitopological and spectral dualities for Heyting algebras, thereby providing two new alternatives to Esakia's duality.

Type
Paper
Information
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , June 2010 , pp. 359 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramsky, S. (1991) Domain theory in logical form. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 51 (1-2)1–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M. E. (1973) The Frattini sublattice of a distributive lattice. Algebra Universalis 3 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Manilla, M., Jung, A. and Keimel, K. (2004) The probabilistic powerdomain for stably compact spaces. Theoretical Computer Science 328 (3)221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsangue, M. and Kurz, A. (2007) Pi-calculus in logical form. In: 22nd IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2007), IEEE 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cignoli, R., Lafalce, S. and Petrovich, A. (1991) Remarks on Priestley duality for distributive lattices. Order 8 (3)299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, W. H. (1975) On H. Priestley's dual of the category of bounded distributive lattices. Mat. Vesnik 12 (27) (4) 329–332.Google Scholar
Dvalishvili, B. P. (2005) Bitopological spaces: theory, relations with generalized algebraic structures, and applications. North-Holland Mathematics Studies 199.Google Scholar
Esakia, L. L. (1974) Topological Kripke models. Soviet Math. Dokl. 15 147–151.Google Scholar
Esakia, L. L. (1975) The problem of dualism in the intuitionistic logic and Browerian lattices. In: V Inter. Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 7–8.Google Scholar
Esakia, L. L. (1985) Heyting Algebras I. Duality Theory (in Russian), ‘Metsniereba’, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
Fleisher, I. (2000) Priestley's duality from Stone's. Adv. in Appl. Math. 25 (3)233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, M., Grigorieff, S. and Pin, J.-E. (2008) Duality and equational theory of regular languages. In: Aceto, L., Damgaard, I., Goldberg, L., Halldorsson, M., Ingolfsdottir, A. and Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) Automata, Languages and Programming. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5125 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, M. and Jónsson, B. (1994) Bounded distributive lattices with operators. Math. Japon. 40 (2)207–215.Google Scholar
Gierz, G., Hofmann, K. H., Keimel, K., Lawson, J. D., Mislove, M. and Scott, D. S. (2003) Continuous lattices and domains. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 93, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, J. and Bezhanishvili, G. (2004) MacNeille completions of Heyting algebras. Houston Journal of Mathematics 30 937–952.Google Scholar
Hochster, M. (1969) Prime ideal structure in commutative rings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 142 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, P. T. (1982) Stone spaces, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, A., Kegelmann, M. and Moshier, M. A. (1997) Multilingual sequent calculus and coherent spaces. In: Mathematical foundations of programming semantics (Pittsburgh, PA, 1997). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 6 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, A., Kegelmann, M. and Moshier, M. A. (2001) Stably compact spaces and closed relations. In: Brookes, S. and Mislove, M. (eds.) 17th Conference on Mathematical Foundations of Programming Semantics Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 45 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, A. and Moshier, M. A. (2006) On the bitopological nature of Stone duality. Technical Report CSR-06-13, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Jung, A. and Sünderhauf, P. (1996) On the duality of compact vs. open. In: Papers on general topology and applications (Gorham, ME, 1995). Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 806 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. C. (1963) Bitopological spaces. Proc. London Math. Soc. s3-13 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopperman, R. (1995) Asymmetry and duality in topology. Topology Appl. 66 (1)1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, J. D. (1991) Order and strongly sober compactifications. In: Topology and category theory in computer science (Oxford, 1989), Oxford University Press 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, H. A. (1970) Representation of distributive lattices by means of ordered Stone spaces. Bull. London Math. Soc. 2 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, H. A. (1972) Ordered topological spaces and the representation of distributive lattices. Proc. London Math. Soc. s3-24 507–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, H. A. (1984) Ordered sets and duality for distributive lattices. In: Orders: description and roles (L'Arbresle, 1982). North-Holland Math. Stud. 99 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, I. L. (1973) Zero dimensional bitopological spaces. Indag. Math. 35 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salbany, S. (1974) Bitopological spaces, compactifications and completions. Mathematical Monographs of the University of Cape Town 1.Google Scholar
Salbany, S. (1984) A bitopological view of topology and order. In: Categorical topology (Toledo, Ohio, 1983). Sigma Ser. Pure Math. 5 481–504.Google Scholar
Schmid, J. (2002) Quasiorders and sublattices of distributive lattices. Order 19 (1)11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, M. B. (1992) Stable compactification. I. J. London Math. Soc. s2-45 (2)321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, M. (1937) Topological representation of distributive lattices and Brouwerian logics. Časopis Pešt. Mat. Fys. 67 1–25.Google Scholar