Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:54:35.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representability and autoequivalence groups

Part of: Representation theory of rings and algebras Modules, bimodules and ideals Homological methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

XIAO–WU CHEN
XIAO–WU CHEN*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Wu Wen-Tsun Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Jinzhai Road No. 96, Hefei230026, Anhui, P.R. China. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For a finite dimensional algebra A, the bounded homotopy category of projective A-modules and the bounded derived category of A-modules are dual to each other via certain categories of locally-finite cohomological functors. We prove that the duality gives rise to a 2-categorical duality between certain strict 2-categories involving bounded homotopy categories and bounded derived categories, respectively. We apply the 2-categorical duality to the study of triangle autoequivalence groups.

MSC classification

Primary: 16E35: Derived categories
Secondary: 16G10: Representations of Artinian rings 16D90: Module categories ; module theory in a category-theoretic context; Morita equivalence and duality
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 171 , Issue 3 , November 2021 , pp. 657 - 668
Copyright
© Cambridge Philosophical Society 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angeleri Hügel, L., Koenig, S., Liu, Q. and Yang, D.. Ladders and simplicity of derived module categories. J. Algebra 472 (2017), 15–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, M.R.. Derived categories of sheaves on singular schemes with an application to reconstruction. Adv. Math. 227 (2011), 895–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondal, A.I. and Van den Bergh, M.. Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. Moscow. Math. J. 3(1) (2001), 327–344.Google Scholar
Buchweitz, R.O.. Maximal Cohen–Macaulay modules and Tate cohomology over Gorenstein rings, unpublished manuscript. (1987), available at http://hdl.handle.net/1807/16682.Google Scholar
Chen, X.W. and Ye, Y.. The D-standard and K-standard categories. Adv. Math. 333 (2018), 159–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, J.D., Keller, B. and Neeman, A.. Failure of Brown representability in derived categories. Topology 40(6) (2001), 1339–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happel, D.. On Gorenstein algebras, In: Representation theory of finite groups and finite-dimensional algebras. Prog. Math. 95, 389–404 (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1991).Google Scholar
Johnson, N. and Yau, D.. 2-Dimensional Categories, a book draft, arXiv:2002.06055v3 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G.M. and Street, R.. Review of the elements of 2-categories. Category Seminar (Proc. Sem., Sydney, 1972/1973). Lect. Notes Math. 420, 75–103. (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, H.. Smashing subcategories and the telescope conjecture–an algebraic approach. Invent. Math. 139(1) (2000), 99–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, H.. The stable derived category of a noetherian scheme. Composition. Math. 141 (2005), 1128–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, H.. Completing perfect complexes with appendices by Tobias Barthel and Bernhard Keller. Math. Z., DOI: 10.1007/s00209-020-02490-z (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, H. and Ye, Y.. On the centre of a triangulated category. Proc. Edin. Math. Soc. 54 (2011), 443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeman, A.. Triangulated categories with a single compact generator and a Brown representability theorem. arXiv:1804.02240v3 (2018).Google Scholar
Neeman, A.. The category ${[{\mathbbT^c}]^{{\rm{op}}}}$ as functors on $\mathbbT_c^b$. arXiv:1806.05777v1 (2018).Google Scholar
Neeman, A.. The categories ${\mathbbT^c}$ and $\mathbbT_c^b$ determine each other. arXiv:1806.06471v1 (2018).Google Scholar
Orlov, D.. Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in Landau–Ginzburg models. Trudy Steklov Math. Institute 204 (2004), 240–262.Google Scholar
Rickard, J.. Morita theory for derived categories. J. London Math. Soc. 39(2) (1989), 436–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickard, J.. Derived equivalences as derived functors. J. London Math. Soc. 43(2) (1991), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouquier, R.. Dimensions of triangulated categories. J. K-Theory 1(2) (2008), 193–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouquier, R. and Zimmermann, A.. Picard groups for derived module categories. Proc. London. Math. Soc. 87(1) (2003), 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yekutieli, A.. Dualising complexes, Morita equivalence and the derived Picard group of a ring J. Lond. Math. Soc. 60(3) (1999), 723–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar