Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:02:08.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perturbation of a nest algebra module

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Sotirios Karanasios
Sotirios Karanasios
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Athens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fall, Arveson and Muhly(4) characterized the compact perturbation of nest algebras. In fact they proved that the compact perturbation of a nest algebra corresponding to a nest of projections is the algebra of operators which are quasitriangular relative to this nest. Erdos and Power(3) investigated weakly closed ideals and modules of nest algebras and these exhibit properties that are very close to the properties of the nest algebras themselves. They also showed that in certain cases, as in the case when the homomorphism which determines the nest algebra module is continuous, the results of Fall, Arveson and Muhly carry over to the more general situation. In this paper we provide a characterization of the compact perturbation of any nest algebra module.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , March 1983 , pp. 303 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Arveson, W.Interpolation problems in nest algebras. J. Fund. Anal. 20 (1975), 208–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Barry, J. Y.On the convergence of ordered sets of projections. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1954), 313–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Erdos, J. A. and Power, S. C. Weakly closed ideals of nest algebras. (To be published.)Google Scholar
(4)Fall, T., Arveson, W. and Muhly, P.Perturbations of nest algebras. J. Oper. Theory 1 (1979), 137–150.Google Scholar
(5)Power, S. C.The distance to upper triangular operators. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 88 (1980), 327–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar