Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:51:16.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The partial wave theory of electron-hydrogen atom collisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

I. C. Percival  and
M. J. Seaton
I. C. Percival
Affiliation:
Department of PhysicsUniversity CollegeLondon
M. J. Seaton
Affiliation:
Department of PhysicsUniversity CollegeLondon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper is concerned with the solution of the algebraic problems arising in the partial wave treatment of electron-hydrogen atom collisions. Explicitly antisymmetrized wave functions are used throughout. The boundary conditions are written in S-matrix notation and expressions for total and differential cross-sections obtained. The algebraic coefficients fλ and gλ occurring in the continuous state Hartree-Fock equations are expressed in terms of Racah coefficients, and tabulated as functions of the total angular momentum for atomic s, p and d electrons and all angular momenta of the scattered electron. Expressions are given for the calculation of first-order corrections to the results obtained using approximate wave functions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , July 1957 , pp. 654 - 662
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Biedenharn, L. C., Blatt, J. M. and Rose, M. E.Rev. mod. Phys. 24 (1952), 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Blatt, J. M. and Biedenharn, L. C.Rev. mod. Phys. 24 (1952), 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Blatt, J. M. and Weisskopf, V. F.Theoretical nuclear physics (New York, 1952), p. 517.Google Scholar
(4)Condon, E. U. and Shortley, G. H.The theory of atomic spectra (Cambridge, 1953).Google Scholar
(5)Kohn, W.Phys. Rev. 74 (1948), 1763.Google Scholar
(6)Obi, S., Ishidzu, T., Horie, H., Yanagawa, S., Tanabe, Y. and Sato, M.Ann. Tokyo Astr. Obs. 3 (1953), 89.Google Scholar
(7)Racah, G.Phys. Rev. 61 (1942), 186.Google Scholar
(8)Racah, G.Phys. Rev. 62 (1942), 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Racah, G.Phys. Rev. 63 (1943), 367.Google Scholar
(10)Sharpe, W. T., Kennedy, J. M., Sears, B. J. and Hoyle, M. G.Tables of coefficients for angular distribution analysis (Report C.R.T.-556, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River, Ontario, 1954).Google Scholar
(11)Simon, A., Vander, Sluis J. H. and Biedenharn, L. C.Tables of Racah coefficients (U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Report No. ORNL-1679, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar