Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:18:06.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the summability |R, log ω, 1| of Fourier series and an associated series

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. Mohanty  and
B. K. Ray
R. Mohanty
Affiliation:
Ravenshaw College, Cuttack-3, India
B. K. Ray
Affiliation:
Ravenshaw College, Cuttack-3, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Definition. Let λ ≡ λ(ω) be continuous, differentiable and monotonic increasing in (0, ∞) and let it tend to infinity as ω → ∞. A series is summable |R, λ, r|, where r > 0, if

where A is a fixed positive number(3).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , July 1967 , pp. 721 - 726
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bosanquet, L. S.Note on the absolute summability (C) of a Fourier series. J. London Math. Soc. 11 (1936), 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Izumi, S.Notes on Fourier Analysis (viii): Local properties of Fourier series. Tôhoku. Math. J. 1 (1950), 136–143.Google Scholar
(3)Mohanty, R.On the absolute Riesz summability of a Fourier series and its allied series. Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 52 (1951), 295–320.Google Scholar
(4)Mohanty, R.On the summability |R, log ω, 1| of a Fourier series. J. London Math. Soc. 25 (1950), 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Mohanty, R. and Mahapatra, S.On the absolute logarithmic summability of a Fourier series and its differentiated Fourier series. Proc. American Math. Soc. 7 (1956), 254–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Mohanty, R. and Mahapatra, S.On the absolute logarithmic summability of a Fourier series. Math. Z. 65 (1956), 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar