Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:05:22.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the static field in general relativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Jamal N. Islam
Affiliation:
University College, Cardiff

Abstract

The possibility is explored that the general static solution of Einstein's vacuum field equations is given in terms of a single harmonic function, i.e. solution of the flat space Laplace equation. It is shown that coordinate conditions can be chosen such that one of Einstein's equations reduces to Laplace's equation. To examine the extent to which the metric is determined by the resulting harmonic function ø, a power series expansion is considered in which in the first non-trivial order one gets a system of eight equations for six unknowns. This is reduced to a system of three equations for three unknowns. This is some indication that the coordinate conditions are consistent and shows the sense in which, to this order, the metric is determined by ø. This system of three equations is then solved explicitly for a particular choice of ø, thereby giving an approximate non-axisymmetric solution of Einstein's vacuum equations. This solution is asymptotically flat and could represent the approximate gravitational field of a non-axisymmetric bounded rigid body. The form of a class of time-dependent metric related to the general static metric is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Brurat, Y. In Gravitation, an introduction to current research, ed. Witten, L. (Wiley, 1962).Google Scholar
(2)Einstein, A. and Rosen, N. J.Franklin Inst. 223 (1937), 43.Google Scholar
(3)Einstein, A., Infeld, L. and Hoffman, B.Ann. Math. 39 (1938), 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Weyl, H.Ann. Physik. 54 (1917), 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar