Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:53:58.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Rayleigh assumption in scattering by a periodic surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. F. Millar
Affiliation:
Radio and Electrical Engineering Division, National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada

Abstract

In treating plane wave scattering by a periodic surface, Lord Rayleigh (10) assumed that the discrete, outgoing and evanescent plane wave representation for the scattered field was valid on the surface itself. Recently, this Rayleigh assumption has been questioned and criticized. For the surface y = b cos kx on which the total field vanishes, Petit and Cadilhac(8) have demonstrated its invalidity when Kb > 0·448. The present paper discusses scattering of a wave, incident from y > 0, by an analytic periodic surface y = f(x) ( – ∞ < x < ∞), and shows that the Rayleigh assumption is valid if and only if the solution can be continued analytically across the boundary at least to the line y = minf(x). Conformal mapping and results relating to the analytic continuation of solutions to elliptic partial differential equations reduce the problem to one involving the location of singularities and critical points of a potential Green's function. Provided that the perturbation of the surface from a plane is sufficiently gentle, the validity of the Rayleigh assumption is established. For the surface y = b cos kx it is shown that the assumption is valid if Kb < γ, where γ is a positive number no greater than 0·448, the precise value of which is unknown. Possible extensions of the analysis to different or more general situations are suggested.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Beckmann, P. and Spizzichino, A.The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces. International series of monographs in electromagnetic waves, volume 4 (Pergamon Press; Oxford, 1963).Google Scholar
(2)Garabedian, P. R.Partial differential equations (John Wiley and Sons, Inc; New York, 1964).Google Scholar
(3)Kellogg, O. D.Foundations of potential theory (Dover Publications; New York, 1953).Google Scholar
(4)Lippmamst, B. A.Note on the theory of gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 43 (1953), 408.Google Scholar
(5)Marsh, H. W.In defense of Rayleigh's scattering from corrugated surfaces. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 35 (1963), 18351836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Millar, R. F.Plane wave spectra in grating theory II. Ganad. J. Phys. 41 (1963), 21352154.Google Scholar
(7)Murphy, S. R. and Lord, G. E.Scattering from a sinusoidal surface—a direct comparison of the results of Marsh and Uretsky. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 36 (1964), 15981599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Petit, R. and Cadilhac, M.Sur la diffraction d'une onde plane par un réseau infiniment conducteur. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. A.–B. 262 (1966), 468471.Google Scholar
(9)Petrovsky, I. G.Partial differential equations (Interscience Publishers, Inc; New York, 1st English ed., 1954).Google Scholar
(10)Rayleigh, , Lord, . The theory of sound, volume II (Dover Publications; New York, 1945).Google Scholar
(11)Rayleigh, , Lord, . On the dynamical theory of gratings. Proc. Boy. Soc. Ser. A 79 (1907), 399416.Google Scholar
(12)Uretsky, J. L.Reflection of a plane sound wave from a sinusoidal surface. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 35 (1963), 12931294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Uretsky, J. L.The scattering of plane waves from periodic surfaces. Ann. Physics 33 (1965), 400427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Walsh, J. L.The location of critical points of analytic and harmonic functions (American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, volume 34, New York, 1950).Google Scholar