Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:58:10.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On potential wells and stability in nonlinear elasticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. J. Knops
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh and Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
L. E. Payne
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh and Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

Extract

This paper is devoted to a preliminary discussion of potential wells in non-linear three-dimensional elasticity. Our interest in the subject arises from the role that potential wells play in the justification of the energy criterion as a sufficient condition for stability of an elastic equilibrium solution. It will be recalled that the energy criterion, which is a simple extension of the original Lagrange-Dirichlet version for finite-dimensional systems, states that an equilibrium solution is stable provided the potential energy achieves its minimum on the solution. No proof of this statement as it applies to three-dimensional elasticity is yet forthcoming, although when the notion of a minimum is replaced by that of a potential well, several authors have proved that the criterion thus modified is sufficient for the Liapunov stability of the equilibrium solution with respect to appropriate measures. Indeed, the proofs are applicable to many other continuum theories, apart from elasticity. (See, for instance, Coleman(5), Gurtin(11) and Koiter(21).) It thus becomes important to determine what constitutive and other conditions, if any, ensure the existence of a potential well. While we present two such conditions, our main purpose is to describe examples in support of the conjecture that non-existence rather than existence of a potential well is likely to be the generic property. In these examples, particular forms of the potential energy are chosen which have positive-definite quadratic part and yet in any W1, P-neighbourhood (1 ≤ p ≤ ∞) of the origin, have a non-positive infimum, thus violating a condition for existence of a potential well in the, Sobolev space W1, P (1 ≤ p ≤ ∞). Related results are also reported by Ball, Knops and Marsden(3) and by Knops(17) for the space W1, ∞. Another conclusion to be drawn from these examples, is that a potential well cannot be ensured by restricting only the quadratic part of the potential energy. Indeed, in our example, we show that the equilibrium (null) solution is unstable in the sense that (non-linear) motions, starting in its neighbourhood, cease to exist after finite time. The same phenomenon has been shown by Knops, Levine and Payne(19) (see also Hills and Knops(14)) to hold for a general class of materials which includes as a special case one possessing the potential energy considered in our example.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Ball, J. M.Convexity conditions and existence thoerems in nonlinear elasticity. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 63 (1977), 337403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Ball, J. M. Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elastostatics. Non-linear Analysis and Mechanics: Heriot-Watt University Symposium (Pitman, 1977).Google Scholar
(3)Ball, J. M., Knops, R. J. and Marsden, J. E.Two examples in nonlinear elasticity. Proceedings of the Journées d'Analyse Non-Linéaire, 1977 (to appear).Google Scholar
(4)Bolza, O.Lectures on the calculus of variations, 3rd ed. cp. p. 74 (N.Y., Chelsea, 1973).Google Scholar
(5)Coleman, B. D., The energy criterion for stability in continuum thermodynamics. Rend. Sem. Mat. Fis. Milano 43 (1973), 8599.Google Scholar
(6)Como, M. and Grimaldi, A.Stability, buckling and post-buckling of elastic structures. Meccanica, 12 1975, 254268.Google Scholar
(7)Dafermos, C. M. Characteristics in hyperbolic conservation laws. A study of the structure and the asymptotic behaviour of solutions. Nonlinear Analysis and Mechanics: Heriot-Watt University Symposium, vol. I (Pitman, 1977).Google Scholar
(8)Dickey, R. W.Infinite systems of nonlinear oscillation equations related to the string. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (1969), 459468.Google Scholar
(9)Ericksen, J. L.Thermoelastic stability, Proc. 5th U.S. Nat. Congr. Appl. Mech. ASMS, 1966, 187193.Google Scholar
(10)Ericksen, J. L.A thermo-kinetic view of elastic stability theory. Internat. J. Solids and Structures 2 (1966), 573580.Google Scholar
(11)Gurtin, M. E.Thermodynamics and stability. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 59 (1975), 6396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Hale, J. K.Ordinary differential equations (New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1969).Google Scholar
(13)Hartman, P.Ordinary differential equations (corrected reprint, Baltimore, 1975).Google Scholar
(14)Hills, R. N. and Knops, R. J.Qualitative results for a general class of material behaviour. S.I.A.M. J. Appl. Math. 30 (1976), 424451.Google Scholar
(15)Hughes, T. J. R., Kato, T. and Marsden, J. E.Well-posed quasi-linear second order hyperbolic systems with applications to nonlinear elasticity and general relativity. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 63 (1977), 273294.Google Scholar
(16)John, F.Delayed singularity formation in solutions of nonlinear wave equations in higher dimensions. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 29 (1976), 659682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Kato, T. Private communication.Google Scholar
(18)Knops, R. J. On potential wells in nonlinear elasticity. (To appear.)Google Scholar
(19)Knops, R. J., Levine, H. A. and Payne, L. E.Nonexistence, instability and growth theorems for solutions of a class of abstract nonlinear equations with applications to nonlinear elastodynamics. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 55 (1974), 5272.Google Scholar
(20)Knops, R. J. and Wilkes, E. W.Theory of elastic stability. Handbuch der Physik VIa/3 (1973), 125302.Google Scholar
(21)Koiter, W. T.The energy criterion of stability for continuous elastic bodies. Proc. Kon. Ned. Ak. Wet. B 68 (1965), 178202.Google Scholar
(22)Lax, P. D.Development of singularities of solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equations. J. Math. Phys. 5 (1964), 611613.Google Scholar
(23)Martini, R.On the Fréchet differentiability of certain energy functional. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akcad. Wet. (to appear).Google Scholar
(24)McCamy, R. C. and Mizel, V. J.Existence and non-existence in the large of solutions of quasilinear wave equations. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 25 (1967), 299320.Google Scholar
(25)Mejlbro, L.On the energy criterion of stability for continuous elastic bodies. Report of the Matematisk Institut, Danmarks Tekniske Højskole, 08 1976.Google Scholar
(26)Naghdi, P. M. and Trapp, J. A.On the general theory of stability for elastic bodies. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 51 (1973), 165191.Google Scholar
(27)Payne, L. E. and Sattinger, D. H.Saddle points and instability of nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Israel J. Math. 22 (1975), 273303.Google Scholar
(28)Sattinger, D. H.On global solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 30 (1968), 148172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(29)Van Hove, L.Sur le signe de la variation seconde des intégrades multiples à plusieurs functions inconnues. Acad. Roy. Belg. 25 (1949), 368.Google Scholar
(30)Yudovich, . Stability of steady flows of viscous incompressible fluids. Soviet Physics Dokl. 10 (1965), 193.Google Scholar