Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:48:15.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On certain Subgroups of the fundamental group of a closed surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

William Jaco
William Jaco
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Introduction. Although Corollaries 4 and 5 to Theorem 1 below appear elsewhere in the literature (1, 2), the proofs given seem to use rather long and involved arguments and refer to other results in the literature for their completeness. The proofs given below are brief and follow quite naturally in sequence with the other corollaries from Theorem 1. The arguments presented are independent of references to the literature except for the reference in the proof of Theorem 1 to Lemma 2·1 of (3), which is well known to topologists. For our purposes this theorem may be stated as: For each open 2-manifold M (non-compact and without boundary), there is a subcomplex L made up of edges of some triangulation of M such that the open simplicial neighbourhood of L is piecewise linearly homeomorphic to M.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 1970 , pp. 17 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Greendlinger, M.A class of groups all of whose elements have trivial centralizers. Math. Z.. 78 (1962), 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Papakyriakopoulos, C. D.A reduction of the Poincaré Conjecture to group theoretic conjectures. Ann. of Math.. 77 (1963), 250–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Whitehead, J. H. C.The immersion of an open 3-manifold in Euclidean 3-space. Proc. London Math. Soc.. 11 (1961), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Stallings, J. How not to prove the Poincaré Conjecture. Topology Seminar, Wisconsin, 1965 (Princeton University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
(5)Siefert, , and Threlfall, . Lehrbuch der topologie (Teubner; Leipzig, 1934).Google Scholar