Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:53:45.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Bose-Einstein Condensation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

P. T. Landsberg
Affiliation:
Department of Natural PhilosophyUniversity of Aberdeen

Abstract

This paper contains a proof that the description of the phenomenon of Bose-Einstein condensation is the same whether (1) an open system is contemplated and treated on the basis of the grand canonical ensemble, or (2) a closed system is contemplated and treated on the basis of the canonical ensemble without recourse to the method of steepest descents, or (3) a closed system is contemplated and treated on the basis of the canonical ensemble using the method of steepest descents. Contrary to what is usually believed, it is shown that the crucial factor governing the incidence of the condensation phenomenon of a system (open or closed) having an infinity of energy levels is the density of states N(E) ∝ En for high quantum numbers, a condition for condensation being n > 0. These results are obtained on the basis of the following assumptions: (i) For large volumes V (a) all energy levels behave like V−θ, and (b) there exists a finite integer M such that it is justifiable to put for the jth energy level Ej= c V−θand to use the continuous spectrum approximation, whenever j ≥ M c θ τ are positive constants, (ii) All results are evaluated in the limit in which the volume of the gas is allowed to tend to infinity, keeping the volume density of particles a finite and non-zero constant. The present paper also serves to coordinate much of previously published work, and corrects a current misconception regarding the method of steepest descents.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Ansbacher, F. and Ehrenberg, W.Phil. Mag. (7), 40 (1949), 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)De Groot, S. R., Hooyman, G. J. and Ten, Seldam C. A.Proc. roy. Soc. A 203 (1950), 266.Google Scholar
(3)Dingle, R. B.Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 45 (1949), 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Fowler, R. H. and Jones, H.Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 34 (1938), 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Fraser, A. R.Phil. Mag. (7), 42 (1951), 156 and 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Genttle, C.Nuovo Cim. 17 (1940), 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)London, F.Phys. Rev. (2), 54 (1938), 947; J. phys. Chem. 43 (1939), 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Sakai, T.Proc. phys.-math. Soc. Japan, 22 (1940), 199.Google Scholar
(9)Schroedinger, E.Statistical thermodynamics (Cambridge, 1948).Google Scholar
(10)Schubert, G.Z. Naturf. 1 (1946), 113; 2a (1947), 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Sommerfeld, A.Ber. dtsch. chem. Ges. 75 (1942), 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Temperley, H. N. V.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 199 (1949), 361.Google Scholar
(13)Ter, Haar D.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 212 (1952), 552.Google Scholar
(14)Ter, Haar D.Physica, 's Grav., 18 (1952), 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Tolman, R. C.Statistical mechanics (Oxford, 1938), p. 512.Google Scholar