Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:33:35.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Note on the pedal locus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. P. Gabbatt
Affiliation:
Peterhouse

Extract

While the paper “On the pedal locus in non-euclidean hyperspace” was in the press, Professor H. F. Baker kindly directed the writer's attention to a reference from which it appeared that the euclidean case had first been studied by Beltrami. After publication, it was discovered that the main subject of Beltrami's paper was the non-euclidean case. He proves, by analytical methods, theorems which may be stated as follows: Let A0, A1,…, An denote the vertices of a simplex, [A], in non-euclidean space of n dimensions, and P a point such that the orthogonal projections of P on the walls of [A] lie in a flat, p; then the locus of P is an (n − 1)- fold, W, of order n + 1, which is anallagmatic for the isogonal transformation q. [A]; the isogonal conjugate of P is the absolute pole of p, and the envelope, w, of p is therefore the absolute reciprocal of W. Beltrami does not note the theorem, fundamental for the geometrical treatment of the subject, that W is the Jacobian of a certain group of n + 1 point-hyperspheres. He goes on to show that in the euclidean case the locus W breaks up into an n-ic (n − 1)-fold and the flat at infinity, while the envelope w does not, in general, break up. Finally, he notes that in two dimensions there is also a special non-euclidean case, in which W breaks up into an order-conic and a line, and w into a class-conic and a point; and that the appropriate condition is fundamentally that which is necessary for the degeneration of a certain class-conic into a pair of points. “But what are the points? And what is the corresponding condition satisfied by the absolute conic? This is a question which it would be interesting to resolve.” It does not appear that the subject has been pursued further; and in the present note an attempt is made to discuss fully the analogous case qi degeneracy in n dimensions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Gabbatt, , Proc. Cumb. Phil. Soc. xxi (1923), 763771. References in the text, thus: (2.22), are to this paper.Google Scholar

Encyk. d. math. Wiss. III, C 7, 806–7, footnote 121.Google Scholar

* Mem. Acc. Bologna (3) VII (1876), 241262 = Op. mat. III, 53–72.Google Scholar

§ See Eneyk. d. math. Wiss. III, C 7, 962.Google Scholar

* Beltrami terms W, w respectively the hypersteinerian locus and envelope q. [A]. This term is used in a different sense by Brambilla, , Rend. Acc. Napoli, XXXVIII (1899), 144–5.Google Scholar

Bauer, , Sitz. Akad. München, XVIII (1888), 337354Google Scholar, proves this theorem for three dimensions; see Jessop, , Quartic Surfaces, Cambridge (1916), 189190.Google Scholar

* See Schläfli, , J. f. Math, LXV (1866), 189197.Google Scholar

* Cf. Gabbatt, , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), xxiv (1925), 173.Google Scholar

* Cf Neuberg, , Mathesis, (3) VIII (1908), 159160Google Scholar; Juhel-Rénoy, ibid. 257–258.

E.g. from Gabbatt, , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. xxi (1923), 297362, §§9.12, 15.1.Google Scholar