Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:16:52.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The joint distribution for the sizes of the generations in a cascade process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

I. J. Good
I. J. Good
Affiliation:
25 Scott HousePrincess Elizabeth WayCheltenham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Notes
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , January 1955 , pp. 240 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bartlett, M. S.The dual recurrence relation for multiplicative processes. Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 47 (1951), 821–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Galton, F.Natural Inheritance (London, 1889), Appendix F by the Rev. H. W. Watson, F.R.S.Google Scholar
(3)Good, I. J.The number of individuals in a cascade process. Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 45 (1949), 360–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Good, I. J.Contribution to the discussion in a symposium on stochastic processes. J.R. Statist. Soc. B, 11 (1949), 271–3. Errata slip bound with the next number of the Journal.Google Scholar
(5)Goursat, E.Functions of a complex variable, vol. 2, part I of A Course of Mathematical Analysis. English translation by Hedrick, E. R. and Dunkel, O. (Boston, New York, etc., 1916).Google Scholar
(6)Harris, T. E. Some mathematical models for branching processes. Second Berkeley Symposium on Math. Statistics and Probability (Berkeley, 1951), pp. 305–28.Google Scholar
(7)Hawkins, D. and Ulam, S. Theory of multiplicative processes, I. Los Alamos declassified document 265 (1951). (Mentioned by Harris (6)).Google Scholar
(8)Otter, R.The multiplicative process. Ann. math. Statist. 20 (1949), 206–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar