Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:43:11.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irregular threefolds which possess anticanonical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

L. Roth
L. Roth
Affiliation:
Imperial CollegeLondon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present paper is a sequel to a previous study (7) of the completely regular threefolds which possess anticanonical systems, i.e. for which the virtual canonical system, reversed in sign, is effective of positive order. On any such threefold the process of successive adjunction, applied to any linear system of surfaces, must terminate; we have thus to deal with a special case of the adjunction problem for the regular threefolds. By making certain simplifying hypotheses (such as irreducibility and absence of base elements) concerning the anticanonical systems, one can classify the threefolds in broad outline and show that, provided the anticanonical systems are sufficiently ample, the corresponding threefolds are either unirational or birational.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 1956 , pp. 617 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Castelnuovo, G.R. C. Accad. Lincei (5), 6 (1897), 372 and 406.Google Scholar
(2)Castelnuovo, G.R. C. Accad. Lincei (5), 14 (1905), 545, 593 and 655.Google Scholar
(3)Castelnuovo, G. and Enriques, F.Ann. Mat. pura appl. (3), 6 (1901), 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Enriques, F.Le euperficie algebriche (Bologna, 1949).Google Scholar
(5)Enriques, F. and Severi, F.Acta Math., Stockh., 32 (1909), 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Fano, G.Atti Congr. Int. 1928 (Bologna, 1931), 4, 115.Google Scholar
(7)Roth, L.Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 48 (1952), 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Roth, L.Atti IV Congr. U.M.I. (Roma, 1953), 2, 434.Google Scholar
(9)Roth, L.R. C. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2), 2 (1953), 141.Google Scholar
(10)Roth, L.Algebraic threefolds (with special regard to problems of rationality) (Berlin, 1955).Google Scholar
(11)Severi, F.R. C. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 28 (1909), 33.Google Scholar
(12)Severi, F.R. C. Accad. Lincei (5), 20 (1911), 537.Google Scholar
(13)Severi, F.R. C. Accad. Lincei (8), 18 (1955), 131.Google Scholar
(14)Severi, F.R. C. Accad. Lincei (8), 20 (1956), 7.Google Scholar
(15)Zariski, O.Ann. Math., Princeton (2), 45 (1944), 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar