Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:52:44.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Haken spheres for genus two Heegaard splittings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2017

SANGBUM CHO  and
YUYA KODA
SANGBUM CHO
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Education, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea. e-mail: [email protected]
YUYA KODA
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8526, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A manifold which admits a reducible genus-2 Heegaard splitting is one of the 3-sphere, S2 × S1, lens spaces or their connected sums. For each of those splittings, the complex of Haken spheres is defined. When the manifold is the 3-sphere, S2 × S1 or a connected sum whose summands are lens spaces or S2 × S1, the combinatorial structure of the complex has been studied by several authors. In particular, it was shown that those complexes are all contractible. In this work, we study the remaining cases, that is, when the manifolds are lens spaces. We give a precise description of each of the complexes for the genus-2 Heegaard splittings of lens spaces. A remarkable fact is that the complexes for most lens spaces are not contractible and even not connected.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 165 , Issue 3 , November 2018 , pp. 563 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Akbas, E. A presentation for the automorphisms of the 3-sphere that preserve a genus two Heegaard splitting. Pacific J. Math. 236 (2008), 201–222.Google Scholar
[2] Bonahon, F. and Otal, J.–P. Scindements de Heegaard des espaces lenticulaires. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4), 16 (1983), 451–466.Google Scholar
[3] Cho, S. Homeomorphisms of the 3-sphere that preserve a Heegaard splitting of genus two. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), 1113–1123.Google Scholar
[4] Cho, S. Genus two Goeritz groups of lens spaces. Pacific J. Math. 265 (2013), no. 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
[5] Cho, S. and Koda, Y. The genus two Goeritz group of 𝕊2 × 𝕊1. Math. Res. Lett. 21 (2014), no. 3, 449–460.Google Scholar
[6] Cho, S. and Koda, Y. Disk complexes and genus two Heegaard splittings for non-prime 3-manifolds. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2015 (2015), no. 12, 4344–4371.Google Scholar
[7] Cho, S. and Koda, Y. and Seo, A. Arc complexes, sphere complexes and Goeritz groups. Michigan Math. J. 65 (2016), no. 2, 333–351.Google Scholar
[8] Cho, S. and Koda, Y. Connected primitive disk complexes and genus two Goeritz groups of lens spaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2016 (2016), no. 23, 7302–7340.Google Scholar
[9] Koda, Y. Automorphisms of the 3-sphere that preserve spatial graphs and handlebody-knots. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 159 (2015), no. 1, 1–22.Google Scholar
[10] Lei, F. Haken spheres in the connected sum of two lens spaces. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 138 (2005), 97–105.Google Scholar
[11] Lei, F. and Zhang, Y. Haken spheres in genus 2 Heegaard splittings of nonprime 3-manifolds. Topology Appl. 142 (2004), 101–111.Google Scholar
[12] McCullough, D. Virtually geometrically finite mapping class groups of 3-manifolds. J. Diff. Geom. 33 (1991), 1–65.Google Scholar
[13] Rolfsen, D. Knots and Links. Math. Lect. Ser. 7 (Publish or Perish, 1976).Google Scholar
[14] Scharlemann, M. Automorphisms of the 3-sphere that preserve a genus two Heegaard splitting. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana 10 (2004), 503–514.Google Scholar
[15] Scharlemann, M. and Thompson, A. Unknotting tunnels and Seifert surfaces. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 87 (2003), 523–544.Google Scholar
[16] Waldhausen, F. Heegaard–Zerlegungen der 3-Sphäre. Topology 7 (1968), 195–203.Google Scholar