Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:32:12.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The eigenvalues of ∇2u + λu=0 when the boundary conditions are given on semi-infinite domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. S. Jones
D. S. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of MathematicsThe UniversityManchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The spectrum of −∇2 (and of −∇2 + b) is investigated when the boundary conditions are given on surfaces which extend to infinity. Simple criteria are obtained for determining whether point-eigenvalues are present in the lower part of the spectrum.

Semi-infinite domains which are conical at infinity are found to possess purely continuous spectra when the boundary condition is u = 0 or ∂u/∂v = 0; the radiation condition ensures a unique solution. A counter-example shows that this is not true in general for the boundary condition ∂u/∂v + σu = 0.

Semi-infinite domains which are cylindrical at infinity have a continuous spectrum with a discrete spectrum embedded in it. An example is given.

The results are applied to the theory of surface waves. It is shown that Ursell's ‘trapping modes’ can occur in a canal of finite width when the bed has a protrusion over a finite longth but is otherwise of uniform depth. Trapping modes can also occur when the canal contains a submerged cylinder (not necessarily small in cross-section).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , October 1953 , pp. 668 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Courant, R. and Hilbert, D.Methoden der mathematischen Physik, vol. 1 (Berlin, 1931), chap. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Courant, R. and Hilbert, D.Methoden der mathematischen Physik, vol. 2 (Berlin, 1937), chap. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Friedrichs, K.Math. Ann. 109 (1933), 465–87 and 685–713; and 110 (1934), 777–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Friedrichs, K.Amer. J. Math. 61 (1939), 523–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Jones, D. S.Quart. J. Mech. 3 (1950), 420–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Rellich, F.Jber. dtsch. Mat V er. 53 (1943), 157–65.Google Scholar
(7)Rellich, F.Studies and essays presented to R. Courant (New York, 1948), pp. 329–44.Google Scholar
(8)Sommerfeld, A.Math. Ann. 47 (1896), 317–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Ursell, F.Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 47 (1951), 347–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Ursell, F.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 214 (1952), 79–97.Google Scholar
(11)Weyl, H.R.C. Gire. mat. Palermo, 27 (1909), 373–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar