Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:33:00.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Divisors computing the minimal log discrepancy on a smooth surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2017

MASAYUKI KAWAKITA*
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We study a divisor computing the minimal log discrepancy on a smooth surface. Such a divisor is obtained by a weighted blow-up. There exists an example of a pair such that any divisor computing the minimal log discrepancy computes no log canonical thresholds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Abhyankar, S. S. Resolution of singularities of embedded algebraic surfaces. Second edition. Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, 1998).Google Scholar
[2] Blum, H. On divisors computing MLD's and LCT's. arXiv:1605.09662.Google Scholar
[3] Hacon, C. D., McKernan, J. and Xu, C. ACC for log canonical thresholds. Ann. of Math. (2) 180 (2014), no. 2, 523571.Google Scholar
[4] Hironaka, H. Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic zero. I, II. Ann. of Math. (2) 79 (1964), 109203; ibid. (2) 79 (1964), 205–326.Google Scholar
[5] Kollár, J. Singularities of the minimal model program. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 200 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
[6] Kollár, J., Smith, K. E. and Corti, A. Rational and nearly rational varieties. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 92 (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
[7] Shokurov, V. V. Letters of a bi-rationalist. V. Minimal log discrepancies and termination of log flips. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 246 (2004), 328351; translation in Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 246 (2004), 315–336.Google Scholar