Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:04:48.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cut points, conjugate points and Lorentzian comparison theorems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

John K. Beem  and
Paul E. Ehrlich
John K. Beem
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Paul E. Ehrlich
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Introduction. The purpose of this paper is to study the global geometry of a space–time (M, g), which is related to the Lorentzian distance function induced on the manifold M by the Lorentzian structure. We will use the signature convention (−, +, …, +) for g and assume that (M, g) is time orientated. The first part of this paper deals with cut points and maximal geodesies, both of which were defined in (1) using the Lorentzian distance function in analogy to the standard concepts in Rie-mannian geometry. In (1), sections 2 and 3, some elementary properties of maximal geodesies were established. In particular, the principle that, for strongly causal space-times, a limit curve of a sequence of future-directed nonspacelike ‘almost maximal’ curves is a maximal geodesic was used to prove nonspacelike incompleteness ((1), theorem 6·3). Also null cut points were used to obtain results on null incompleteness ((1), section 5). In (2) we studied deeper properties of maximal geodesies and cut points using the technical tools developed in (1), sections 2 and 3. The first part of the present paper continues these investigations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 86 , Issue 2 , September 1979 , pp. 365 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Beem, J. K. and Ehrlich, P. E.Singularities, incompleteness and the Lorentzian distance function. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 85 (1979), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Beem, J. K. and Ehrlich, P. E.The space–time cut locus. General Relativity and Gravitation, to appear.Google Scholar
(3)Beem, J. K. and Woo, P. Y.Doubly timelike surfaces. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. no. 92 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Bölts, G.Existenz und Bedeutung von konjugierten Werten in der Raum-Zeit (Bonner Universität Diplomarbeit, 01 1977).Google Scholar
(5)Busemann, H. and Beem, J. K.Axioms for indefinite metrics. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) 15 (1966), 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Cheeger, J. and Ebin, D.Comparison theorems in riemannian geometry (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1975).Google Scholar
(7)Everson, J. and Talbot, C. J.Morse theory on timelike and causal curves. General Relativity and Gravitation 7 (1976), 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Flaherty, F. J. Lorentzian manifolds of nonpositive curvature. A.M.S. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 27, part 2 (Stanford, 1973), 395–399.Google Scholar
(9)Geroch, R. P.The domain of dependence, J. Math. Phys. 11 (1970), 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Gromoll, D., Klingenberg, W. and Meyer, W.Riemannsche Geometrie im Grossen. Led. Notes Math. no. 55, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Hawking, S. W. and Ellis, G. F. R.The large scale structure of space–time (Cambridge University Press, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Hawking, S. W. and Penrose, R.The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 314 (1970), 529–549.Google Scholar
(13)Kobayashi, S.On conjugate and cut loci. Studies in Global Geometry and Analysis (MAA Studies in Math. 4 (1967)), 96–122.Google Scholar
(14)Penrose, R. Techniques of differential topology in relativity. Regional Conference Series in Applied Math. 7 (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1972).Google Scholar
(15)Tipler, F.Singularities and causality violation. Ann. of Phys. 108 (1977), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Tipler, F.Black holes in closed universes. Nature 270 (1977), 500–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Uhlenbeck, K.A Morse theory for geodesies on a Lorentz manifold, Topology 14 (1975), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Woodhouse, N. M. J.An application of Morse theory to space–time geometry. Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar