Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:26:04.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bifurcation of periodic solutions near a collision of eigenvalues of opposite signature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Thomas J. Bridges
Thomas J. Bridges
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When two purely imaginary eigenvalues of opposite Krein signature coalesce, in a Hamiltonian system, a small perturbation can drive them off of the imaginary axis resulting in a linear instability. The most celebrated example of this instability occurs in the restricted 3-body problem at Routh's critical mass ratio. In this paper the collision of eigenvalues is treated as a singularity. A variational form of the Lyapunov–Schmidt method and distinguished parameter ࡃ2-equivariant singularity theory, with the frequency as distinguished parameter, are used to determine the effect of the degeneracy on the branches of periodic solutions in a neighbourhood. Previous results of Meyer and Schmidt[13], Sokol'skij [16] and van der Meer [12] are recovered in the formulation as a co-dimension 1 singularity. The results are extended to include the effect of an additional degeneracy (a co-dimension 2 singularity). The theory is applied to a spinning double pendulum.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 108 , Issue 3 , November 1990 , pp. 575 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Benjamin, T. B. and Bridges, T. J.. Reappraisal of the Kelvin–Helmholtz problem. Part 2: Travelling waves and bifurcations. (Preprint, Oxford University.)Google Scholar
[2]Bridges, T. J.. Strong internal resonance, ࡌ2 ⊕ ࡌ2-symmetry and multiple periodic solutions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 19 (1988), 1015–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bridges, T. J.. Stability of periodic solutions near a collision of eigenvalues of opposite signature. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 109 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Burgoyne, N. and Cushman, R.. Normal forms for real linear Hamiltonian systems with purely imaginary eigenvalues. Celestial Mech. 8 (1974), 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Galin, D. M.. Versal deformations of linear Hamiltonian systems. Amer. Math. Soc. Trans. Ser. 2 118 (1982), 1–12.Google Scholar
[6]Golubitsky, M. and Schaeffer, D.. Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, vol. 1. Appl. Math. Sci. no. 51 (Springer-Verlag, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Golubitsky, M., Stewart, I. and Schaeffer, D.. Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, vol. 2. Appl. Math. Sci. no. 69 (Springer-Verlag, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Howard, J. E. and Mackay, R. S.. Linear stability of symplectic maps. J. Math. Phys. 28 (1987), 1036–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kozlov, V. V.. Calculus of variations in the large and classical mechanics. Russian Math. Surveys 40 (1985), 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Krein, M. G.. Foundations of the theory of λ-zones of stability of a canonical system of linear differential equations with periodic coefficients. Amer. Math. Soc. Trans. Ser. 2 120 (1955), 1–70.Google Scholar
[11]van der Meer, J.. Nonsemisimple 1:1 resonance at an equilibrium. Celestial Mech. 27 (1982), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]van der Meer, J.. The Hamiltonian Hopf Bifurcation. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 1160 (Springer-Verlag, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Meyer, K. R. and Schmidt, D. S.. Periodic orbits near L 4 for mass ratios near the critical mass ratio of Routh. Celestial Mech. 4 (1971), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Meyer, K. R.. Bibliographic notes on generic bifurcation in Hamiltonian systems. In Multiparameter Bifurcation Theory, Contemp. Math. no. 56 (American Mathematical Society, 1986). pp. 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Montaldi, J., Roberts, M. and Stewart, I.. Existence of nonlinear normal modes of symmetric Hamiltonian systems. (Preprint, University of Warwick.)Google Scholar
[16]Sokol'skij, A. G.. On the stability of an autonomous Hamiltonian system with two degrees of freedom in the case of equal frequencies. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 38 (1974), 791–799.Google Scholar
[17]Vanderbauwhede, A.. Hopf bifurcation at nonsemisimple eigenvalues. In Multiparameter Bifurcation Theory, Contemp. Math. no. 56 (American Mathematical Society, 1986). pp. 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar