No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Several suggestions have recently been made that the course of radioactive transformation is not, as is usually believed, independent of such changes of the physical environment as may be effected on earth. To the particular locality, to the concentration of the source, and to the action of intense γ radiation have been attributed effects which their investigators have been unable to ascribe to other contingencies. In particular, Pokrowski has developed a tentative hypothesis to explain the complicated anomalies which he had already observed.
* Bogoīavlensky, , J. Physique, 10, p. 321 (1929);CrossRefGoogle Scholar for criticism see Curie, , J. Physique, 10, p. 329 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
† Kutzner, , Zeit. für Phys., 44, p. 655 (1927);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPokrowski, , Zeit. für Phys., 58, p. 706 (1929);CrossRefGoogle Scholar for criticism see Curtiss, ,Journ. Bureau Stds., 4, p. 595 (1930).Google Scholar
‡ Pokrowski, , Zeit. für Phys., 59, p. 427 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
§ Zeit. fü Phys., 60, p. 845 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
| Phys. Rev., 35, p. 705 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
¶ Zeit. für Phys., 62, p. 432 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
* Erbacher, and Philipp, , Zeit. für Phys., 51, p. 309 (1928).CrossRefGoogle Scholar