Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:28:57.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Topological pseudofree actions on spheres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Sławomir Kwasik  and
Reinhard Schultz
Sławomir Kwasik
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, U.S.A.
Reinhard Schultz
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In topology and geometry it is often instructive to consider objects with isolated singularities. Frequently such objects turn out to be relatively tractable and to provide useful insights into more general situations. For actions of finite cyclic groups on manifolds the standard notion of singularity is a point that is left fixed by some non-trivial element of the group (but not necessarily by the whole group). If the singular set is isolated the action is said to be pseudofree. Special cases of pseudofree actions have been studied in several independent contexts; in particular, previous papers of Cappell and Shaneson [4] and the authors [15] considered classes of ‘nice’ pseudofree actions on spheres. References to other works are given at the beginning of [15] (and in the meantime there has also been considerable further activity).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , May 1991 , pp. 433 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bak, A.. The computation of surgery groups of finite groups with abelian 2-hyperelementary subgroups. In Algebraic K-Theory, Evanston 1976. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 551 (Springer-Verlag, 1976), pp. 394–409.Google Scholar
[2]Bass, H.. Algebraic K-Theory (Benjamin, 1968).Google Scholar
[3]Bourbaki, N.. General Topology (Springer-Verlag, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cappell, S. and Shaneson, J.. Pseudo-free actions, I. In Algebraic Topology, Aarhus 1978. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 763 (Springer-Verlag, 1979), pp. 395–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Edmonds, A. Equivariant regular neighborhoods. In Proceedings of Conference on Transformation Groups. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. no. 26 (Cambridge University Press, 1977), pp. 341–368.Google Scholar
[6]Edwards, D. A. and Hastings, H. M.. Čech and Steenrod Homotopy Theories and Applications to Geometric Topology. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 542 (Springer-Verlag, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Farrell, F. T. and Wagoner, J.. Infinite matrices in algebraic K-theory and topology. Comment. Math. Helv. 47 (1972), 474–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Farrell, F. T. and Wagoner, J.. Algebraic torsion for infinite simple homotopy types. Comment. Math. Helv. 47 (1972), 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Fareell, F. T., Taylor, L. and Wagoner, J.. The Whitehead Theorem in the proper category. Compositio Math. 47 (1973), 1–23.Google Scholar
[10]Hasse, H.. Über die Klassenzahl Abelscher Zahlkörper. Math. Monographien. (Akademie-Verlag, 1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Kervaire, M. and Murthy, M. P.. On the projective class group of cyclic groups of prime power order. Comment. Math. Helv. 52 (1977), 415–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Kwasik, S.. On periodicity in topological surgery. Canad. J. Math. 38 (1986), 1053–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Kwasik, S. and Schultz, R.. Desuspension of group actions and the ribbon theorem. Topology 27 (1988), 444–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Kwasik, S. and Schultz, R.. Homological properties of periodic homeomorphistns of 4-manifolds. Duke Math. J. 58 (1989), 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Kwasik, S. and Schultz, R.. Pseudofree Group Actions on S 4. Amer. J. Math. 112 (1990), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Kwasik, S. and Schultz, R.. Isolated singularities of group actions on 4-manifolds. (Preprint, Purdue University and Tulane University, 1989.)Google Scholar
[17]Maumary, S.. Proper surgery groups for non-compact manifolds of finite dimension. (Multicopied notes, University of California at Berkeley, 1972.)Google Scholar
[18]Maumary, S.. Proper surgery groups and Wall-Novikov groups. In Proceedings Battelle Seattle Conf. on Algebraic K-Theory. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 343 (Springer-Verlag, 1973), pp. 526–539.Google Scholar
[19]Oliver, R., Class groups of cyclic p-groups. Mathematika 30 (1983), 26–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Oliver, R. and Taylor, L.. Logarithmic Descriptions of Whitehead Groups and Class Groups for p-Groups. Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. vol. 36 no. 392 (American Mathematical Society, 1988).Google Scholar
[21]Pedersen, E. K. and Ranicki, A.. Projective surgery theory. Topology 19 (1980), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Siebenmann, L.. The obstruction to finding a boundary for an open manifold of dimension greater than five. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University (1965).Google Scholar
[23]Siebenmann, L.. Infinite simple homotopy types. Indag. Math. 32 (1970), 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Taylor, L.. Surgery on paracompact manifolds. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley (1972).Google Scholar
[25]Wall, C. T. C.. Finiteness conditions for CW-complexes. Ann. of Math. 81 (1965), 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Wall, C. T. C.. Poincaré complexes I. Ann. of Math. 86 (1967), 213–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Wall, C. T. C.. Surgery on Compact Manifolds. London Math. Soc. Monographs no. 1 (Academic Press, 1970).Google Scholar
[28]Wall, C. T. C.. Classification of Hermitian forms: VI-Group rings. Ann. of Math. 103 (1976), 1–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar