Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:53:09.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some conditions for finite presentation of nilpotent-by-abelian groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

A. J. McIsaac
Affiliation:
Dulwich College, London SE 21

Extract

Bieri and Strebel [2] have established a striking criterion that determines whether a metabelian group is finitely presented. This criterion is of a sort that implies that all homomorphic images of a finitely presented metabelian group are finitely presented. Another of their results is that the class of nilpotent-of-class-two-by-abelian groups has the property that all homomorphic images of finitely presented groups in this class are finitely presented. However, they point out that an example due to Abels [1] shows that the class of nilpotent-of-class-three-by-abelian groups does not have this property. One could not therefore expect that a criterion of the same type as that of Bieri and Strebel would distinguish the finitely presented groups in general classes of nilpotent-by-abelian groups. One might hope, however, to find such a criterion for nilpotent-of-class-two-by-abelian groups. The aim of this paper is to make some steps in this direction, by finding a sufficient condition for such groups to be finitely presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Abels, H.. An example of a finitely presented soluble group. In Homological Group Theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series 36 (Cambridge University Press, 1979), pp. 205211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bieri, R. and Strebel, R.. Valuations and finitely presented metabelian groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 41 (1980), 439464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M.. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers (Oxford University Press, 1938).Google Scholar