Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:50:25.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The probability distribution of gene-differences in relation to selection, mutation, and random extinction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. G. Skellam
J. G. Skellam
Affiliation:
585 London RoadOakhillStoke-on Trent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In order to determine the mathematical form of the distribution of gene frequencies in a population, R. A. Fisher (1, 2) applied two different but complementary methods. First, differential equations were set up for certain cases and solved. An extension of these results arose from the expression by Wright (10,11,12) of the conditions as an integral equation. But strictly, neither integral nor differential equations can represent the conditions exactly, since integration is substituted for summation, and differentials for minimum steps (1/2n) in gene frequency. The second method employed by Fisher was exact, even though the solutions involved new functions. The properties of generating functions were utilized to yield functional equations, and the special case of rare mutations was dealt with in detail. In the present paper this powerful method is extended to the general case where mutation rates are not necessarily small.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 1949 , pp. 364 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Fisher, R. A.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 42 (1922), 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Fisher, R. A.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 50 (1930), 205.Google Scholar
(3)Fisher, R. A.The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford, 1930), p. 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Galton, F.Natural Inheritance (London, 1899), p. 242.Google Scholar
(5)Greenwood, M. and Yule, G. U.J. Roy. Statist. 83 (1920), 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Haldane, J. B. S.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 23 (1927), 838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Kendall, D. G.Biometrika, 35 (1948), 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Lotka, A. J.J. Washington Acad. Sci. 21 (1931), 377.Google Scholar
(9)Skellam, J. G.J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Series B, 10 (1948), 257.Google Scholar
(10)Wright, S.American Nat. 63 (1929), 556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Wright, S.Genetics, 16 (1931), 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Wright, S.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Washington, 31 (1945), 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar