Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-n7lw4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-02T05:30:29.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perturbation of functions by the paths of a Lévy process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Steven N. Evans
Steven N. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent paper Mountford [4] showed, using an ingenious probabilistic argument, that if X is a real-valued stable process with index α < 1 and f: [0, ∞) → ℝ is a non-constant continuous function, then

where we use the notation |A| for the Lebesgue measure of a Lebesgue measurable set A ⊂ ℝ. The argument in [4] appears to make strong use of the strict scaling properties of X and the ‘intermediate value’ property of f.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , March 1989 , pp. 377 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Blumenthal, R. M. and Getoor, R. K.. Markov Processes and Potential Theory (Academic Press, 1968).Google Scholar
[2]Doob, J. L.. Classical Potential Theory and its Probabilistic Counterpart (Springer-Verlag, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Fristedt, B.. Sample functions of stochastic processes with stationary independent increments. Adv. Probab. Related Topics. 3 (1974), 241–396.Google Scholar
[4]Mountford, T. S.. Time inhomogeneous Markov processes and the polarity of single points. Ann. Probab. (To appear.)Google Scholar
[5]Serrin, J. and Varberg, D. E.. A general chain rule for derivatives and the change of variable formula for the Lebesgue integral. Amer. Math. Monthly 76 (1969), 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar