Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:30:26.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the slow rotation of axisymmetric solids in magnetohydrodynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. Shail
R. Shail
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, London, S.W. 11
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The motion of a solid in a viscous conducting fluid permeated by a magnetic field has been the subject of a number of papers. Using the Stokes approximation Chester (3) first derived an expansion in powers of the Hartmann number for the drag on a sphere translating uniformly through a fluid, parallel to the applied magnetic field. In a subsequent paper (4) the same author treated the high Hartmann number limit. Later, Chang (2) considered, in the low Hartmann number regime, the motion of an axisymmetric body translating slowly along the axis of a fluid filled tube, and was able to calculate a drag formula which includes the lowest order wall effect term. An alternative treatment of this class of problems has recently been given by Williams (13), using an intergral equation formulation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , October 1967 , pp. 1331 - 1339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Brenner, H.Appl. Sci. Res. A 13 (1964), 550.Google Scholar
(2)Chang, I. D.J. Math. and Phys. 40 (1961), 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Chester, W.J. Fluid Mech. 3 (1957), 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Chester, W.J. Fluid Mech. 10 (1961), 459.Google Scholar
(5)Copson, E. T.Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 8 (1947), 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Gupta, R. K.Appl. Sci. Res. B 12 (1965), 101.Google Scholar
(7)Hocking, L. M.Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 12 (1959), 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Imai, I.Rev. Mod. Phys. 32 (1960), 992.Google Scholar
(9)Jen, C. K.Phys. Rev. 43 (1933), 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Sack, R. A.J. Mathematical Phys. 5 (1964), 245.Google Scholar
(11)Shail, R. and Townend, M. S.Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 19 (1966), 441.Google Scholar
(12)Sowerby, L.Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 49 (1953), 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Williams, W. E.J. Inst. Math. and Applications 1 (1965), 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar