Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T12:54:43.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on Riesz means

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

G. Das
Affiliation:
University CollegeLondon

Extract

1. For the familiar definition of (R, λn, κ), (R*, λn, κ) and (N, p) means and their notations, see, for example (3). If {fn} is any arbitrary sequence, we adopt the convention throughout that f−1 = 0. A method of absolute summability |A| is said to be ineffective if it is absolutely regular and sums only absolutely convergent sequences. The main object of this note is to prove absolute analogues of Kuttner's results in (3). And for this we need to prove a theorem (Theorem 1) on ineffectiveness for |N, p| method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Dikshit, G. D.A note on absolute Riesz summability of infinite series. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India 26 (1960), 1016.Google Scholar
(2)Knopp, K. and Lorentz, G. G.Beiträge zur absoluten Limitierung. Arch. Math. 2 (1949), 1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Kuttner, B.The high indices theorem for discontinuous Riesz means. J. London Math. Soc. 39 (1964), 635–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Maddox, I. J.Note on Riesz means. Quart. J. Math. (Oxford), Ser. 17 (1966), 263–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Mohanty, R.On the absolute Riesz summability of Fourier series and allied series. Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 52 (1951), 295320.Google Scholar
(6)Pati, T.On absolute summability by Riesz means of type exp (n) and order 2. J. Indian Math. Soc. 15 (1961), 2832.Google Scholar
(7)Sunouchi, G.Absolute summability of series with constant terms. Tôhoku Math. J. 1 (1949), 5766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar