Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:30:38.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infinitely divisible projective representations of the Lie algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. Mathon
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Bedford College, London

Extract

Infinitely divisible group representations were first defined by Streater(1) as an important concept closely related to continuous tensor product. Araki(2) analysed the factorizable representations of Lie groups and obtained a generalization of the Levy–Khinchine formula. A similar concept for Lie algebras was defined and studied by Streater in (3). Although the definition is not strictly an infinitesimal analogue of infinitely divisible representations of Lie groups, the results of (3) in the cohomological formulation are very similar to Araki's main theorem. Parthasarathy and Schmidt(4) generalized the concept of infinite divisibifity to the projective representations of locally compact groups and obtained a one-to-one correspondence between infinitely divisible projective representations and 1-co-cycles in the group cohomology with coefficients in a Hubert space. A similar generalization for Lie algebras is studied in the present paper. Infinitely divisible projective representations of Lie algebras are studied by a purely algebraic method, independently of (4) (since not all our projective representations are necessarily integrable). As expected, a one-to-one relation is obtained between the infinitely divisible projective representations and 1-co-cycles in the cohomology on the corresponding enveloping algebra with coefficients in a Hilbert space. The present problem is simpler than the group case since there is no continuity condition on the multiplier in a Lie algebra. A similar algebraic method was used in a discussion of infinitely divisible representations of canonical anticommutation relations (9).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Streater, R. F.Current commutation relations, continuous tensor products and infinitely divisible group representations. Rend. Scuola Internazionale Fis. E. Fermi 11 (1969), 247263.Google Scholar
(2)Araki, H.Factorizable representations of current algebra. RIMS Kyoto 5 (1970), 361422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Streater, R. F.Infinitely divisible representations of Lie algebras. Z. Wahrscheinhichkeits-theorie und Verw. Gebiete. 19 (1971), 6780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Parthasarathy, K. R. and Schmidt, K. Infinitely divisible projective representations, co-cycles and Levy–Khinchine–Araki formula on locally compact groups, Research Report 17, Manchester–Sheffield School of Probability and Statistics, (1970); Positive definite kernels, continuous tensor products, and central limit theorems of probability theory, to appear in: (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer).Google Scholar
(5)Simms, D. J. Lie groups and quantum mechanics. Lecture notes in Mathematics 52 (Springer, 1968).Google Scholar
(6)Nelson, E.Analytic vectors. Ann. of Math. 70 (1959), 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Parthasarathy, K. R.Projective unitary antiunitary representations of locally compact groups. Comm. Math. Phys. 15 (1969), 305328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Jacobson, N.Lie Algebra (Interscience Publishers, 1966).Google Scholar
(9)Mathon, D. and Streater, R. F.Infinitely divisible representations of Clifford algebras Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete 20 (1971), 308316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar