Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:15:07.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The G-values of various games

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Richard K. Guy
Affiliation:
University of MalayaSingapore
Cedric A. B. Smith
Affiliation:
University CollegeLondon

Extract

A disjunctive combination of a finite set of two-person games Γ1, Γ2, …, Γk may be defined thus: The players play alternately, each in turn making a move in one and only one of the individual games. If, in addition, the conditions are imposed that

(i) a player loses if unable to move (in any game),

(ii) the games are impartial, i.e. the allowable moves from any position do not depend on which player is about to play (or on the previous moves, though these can be ‘built in’ to the position if necessary),

(iii) the games are of bounded play, i.e. for each game Γi corresponding to any initial position Pj there is an integer bij such that the game must terminate after at most bij moves, then Grundy (6) has shown that there is a function G(P) (called by him Ω(P)) of the positions P with the following properties:

(1a) G(P) = 0 for a terminal position, from which no move is possible; for other positions G(P) is the smallest non-negative integer different from all values of G(Qi), where there is a permissible move from P to Qi,

(1b) for a disjunctive combination of games, G for the combined position is the nim-sum of the G's the individual positions. By the nim-sum, we mean that each separate G is to be written in the scale of 2, as Σar 2r, and then in forming the sum, the ar's are to be added mod 2 for each value of r, as in the theory of Nim((1), (7), (8), pp. 36–8).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bouton, A. L.Ann. Math., Princeton, (2), 3 (1902), 35–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Dawson, T. R.Fairy Chess Review (12 1934), p. 94, problem 1603.Google Scholar
(3)Dawson, T. R.Caissa's wild, roses (1935), p. 13.Google Scholar
(4)Descartes, Blanche.Eureka, 16 (1953), 1820.Google Scholar
(5)Dudeney, H. E.Canterbury puzzles (London, 1910).Google Scholar
(6)Grundy, P. M.Eureka, 2 (1939), 68.Google Scholar
(7)Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M.Introduction to the theory of numbers, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1945), pp. 116–19.Google Scholar
(8)Rouse Ball, W. W. and Coxeter, H. S. M.Mathematical recreations and essays, 11th ed. (London, 1939).Google Scholar
(9)Smith, C. A. B. Compound two-person deterministic games (unpublished).Google Scholar