Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:06:09.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commuting flows and conservation laws for Lax equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

George Wilson
George Wilson
Affiliation:
University College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years there has been great progress in the study of certain systems of non-linear partial differential equations, namely those that have a ‘Lax representation’

Here P and L are linear differential operators in one variable x, whose coefficients are l × l matrices of functions of x and t. Thus L has the form

where each ui is a matrix of functions ui,αβ(x, t), 1 ≤ α, β ≤ l. The symbol Lt means that we differentiate each coefficient of L, and as usual [P, L] = PL − LP. The coefficients of P are supposed to be polynomials in the ui, αβ and their x-derivatives, so that (1·1) is equivalent to a system of non-linear ‘evolution equations’ for the variables ui, αβ. The simplest example is the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation

which has a Lax representation with

(Here l = 1, and there is only one coefficient ui, αβ. ) The connexion between the KdV equation and this ‘Schrodinger operator’ L was discovered by Gardner, Greene, Kruskal and Miura(6), but it was P. Lax (13) who first pointed out explicitly what we call the Lax representation given by (1·1) and (1·2). The notation (P, L), due to Gel'fand and Dikii(7), reflects this fact.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , July 1979 , pp. 131 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Burchnall, J. L. and Chaundy, T. W.Commutative ordinary differential operators. Proc. London Math. Soc. 21 (1922), 420–440.Google Scholar
(2)Drinfel'd, V. G.On commutative subrings of certain non-commutative rings. Funct. Anal, and its Appl. 11 (1977), 11–14 (Russian), 9–12 (English).Google Scholar
(3)Dubrovin, B. A., Matveev, V. B. and Novikov, S. P.Non-linear equations of Korteweg–de Vries type, finite-zone linear operators and Abelian varieties. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 31, 1 (1976), 55–136 = Russian Math. Surveys 31, 1 (1976), 59–146.Google Scholar
(4)Fadeev, L. D. and Takhtadzhyan, L. A.Essentially non-linear one-dimensional model of classical field theory. Teor. i Mat. Fiz. 21 (1974), 160–174 = Theor. and Math. Phys. 21 (1974), 1046–1057.Google Scholar
(5)Gardner, C. S.Korteweg–de Vries equation and generalizations. IV. The Korteweg–de Vries equation as a Hamiltonian system. J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971), 1548–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Gardner, C. S., Greene, J. M., Kruskal, M. D. and Miura, R. M.Method for solving the Korteweg–de Vries equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967), 1095–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Gel'fand, I. M. and Dikii, L. A.Fractional powers of operators and Hamiltonian systems. Funct. Anal, and Its Appl. 10 (1976), 13–29 (Russian), 259–273 (English).Google Scholar
(8)Gel'fand, I. M. and Dikii, L. A.The resolvent and Hamiltonian systems. Funct. Anal. and Its Appl. 11 (1977), 11–27 (Russian), 93–105 (English).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Gel'fand, I. M. and Levitan, B. M.On the determination of a differential equation from its spectral function. Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Ser. Mat. 15 (1951), 309–360 = A.M.S. translations, vol. 1 (1955), 253–304.Google Scholar
(10)Ince, E. L.Ordinary differential equations (Dover, 1956).Google Scholar
(11)Krichever, I. M.Integration of non-linear equations by methods of algebraic geometry. Funct. Anal, and Its Appl. 11 (1977), 15–31 (Russian), 12–26 (English).Google Scholar
(12)Krichever, I. M.Methods of algebraic geometry in the theory of non-linear equations. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 32, 6 (1977), 183–208 = Russian Math. Surveys 32, 6 (1977), 185–213.Google Scholar
(13)Lax, P. D.Integrals of non-linear equations of evolution and solitary waves. Comm. Pure and Appl. Math. 21 (1968), 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Lax, P. D.Periodic solutions of the KdV equation. Comm. Pure and Appl. Math. 28 (1975), 141–188.Google Scholar
(15)Manin, Yu. I.Algebraic aspects of non-linear differential equations. Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki, Ser. Sovremennie Problemi Matematiki 11 (1978), 5–152 (Russian).Google Scholar
(16)Miura, R. M., Gardner, C. S. and Kruskal, M. D.Korteweg–de Vries equation and generalizations. II. Existence of conservation laws and constants of motion. J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968), 1204–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Mumford, D.An algebro-geometric construction of commuting operators and of solutions to the Toda lattice equation, Korteweg–de Vries equation and related non-linear equations. Proceedings of Kyoto conference (01 1978).Google Scholar
(18)Zakharov, V. E. and Fadeev, L. D.The Korteweg–de Vries equation: a completely integrable Hamiltonian system. Funct. Anal, and Its Appl. 5 (1971), 18–27 (Russian), 280–287 (English).Google Scholar
(19)Zakharov, V. E. and Shabat, A. B.A scheme for integrating the non-linear equations of mathematical physics by the inverse scattering method. Funct. Anal, and Its Appl. 8 (1974), 43–53 (Russian), 226–235 (English).Google Scholar