Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:26:26.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collapsing K × I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Dallas E. Webster
Dallas E. Webster
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Zeeman(5) once bravely made the following conjecture:

Conjecture. Suppose K is a contractible 2-complex and I is the unit interval [0, 1]. Then K × I collapses.

This conjecture is interesting since it trivially implies the Poincaré conjecture. For if C is a homotopy 3-cell, then it has a contractible 2-dimensional spine, so that C × I would be a collapsible 4-manifold. But then C × I would be a 4-cell, with C = C × 0 in its 3-sphere boundary, and the PL Schoenfliess theorem shows that C is a 3-cell.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , July 1973 , pp. 39 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Lickorish, W. B. R. On collapsing X 2 × I. Topology of manifolds, pp. 157–160 (ed. by Cantrell, J. C. and Edwards, C. H.) (Markham: New York, 1970).Google Scholar
(2)Robinson, J. A. On the collapsibility of K × I (to appear).Google Scholar
(3)Wright, P.Collapsing K × I to vertical segments. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 69 (1971), 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Wright, P.On the collapsibility of K × I m. Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 22 (1971), 491–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Zeeman, E. C.On the dunce hat. Topology 2 (1964), 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar