Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T00:57:55.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Canonical stability in terms of singularity index for algebraic threefolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2001

MENG CHEN
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Throughout the ground field is always supposed to be algebraically closed of characteristic zero. Let X be a smooth projective threefold of general type, denote by ϕm the m-canonical map of X which is nothing but the rational map naturally associated with the complete linear system [mid ]mKX[mid ]. Since, once given such a 3-fold X, ϕm is birational whenever m [Gt ] 0, quite an interesting thing to find is the optimal bound for such an m. This bound is important because it is not only crucial to the classification theory, but also strongly related to other problems. For example, it can be applied to determine the order of the birational automorphism group of X [21, remark in section 1]. To fix the terminology we say that ϕm is stably birational if ϕt is birational onto its image for all t [ges ] m. It is well known that the parallel problem in the surface case was solved by Bombieri [1] and others. In the 3-dimensional case, many authors have studied the problem, in quite different ways. Because, in this paper, we are interested in the results obtained by Hanamura [7], we do not plan to mention more references here. According to 3-dimensional MMP, X has a minimal model which is a normal projective 3-fold with only ℚ-factorial terminal singularities. Though X may have many minimal models, the singularity index (namely the canonical index) of any of its minimal models is uniquely determined by X. Denote by r the canonical index of minimal models of X. When r = 1 we know that ϕ6 is stably birational by virtue of [3, 6, 13 and 14]. When r [ges ] 2, Hanamura proved the following theorem.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 Cambridge Philosophical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)