Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:36:22.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Converse Theorems of Summability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

C. T. Rajagopal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper, while it does not merit the attention of workers in the field of summability, may be of some interest to readers of the Gazette who are using Bromwich's classical work on infinite series as a textbook. Its main purpose is to show that Bromwich's proof of the Hardy-Landau converse of Cauchy's limit theorem can be made to yield, without any modification of the underlying idea (due to A. E. Jolliffe), all the familiar converse theorems on Rieszian summability of the first order. The paper also shows that after having obtained these theorems, one can pass on, by a natural transition suggested by Szász, to the corresponding results in the theory of summability by Dirichlet's series

Type
Research Article
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 30 , Issue 292 , December 1946 , pp. 272 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bosanquet, L. S. : “Note on the converse of Abel’s theorem”, Journal London Math. Soc., 19 (1944), 161–168.Google Scholar
2. Bromwich, T. J. l’A.: Theory of Infinite Series, ed. 2, 1926.Google Scholar
3. Fekete, M. and Winn, C. E. : “On the connection between the limits of oscillation of a sequence and its Cesàro and Riesz Means”, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 35 (1933), 488–513.Google Scholar
4. Ingham, A. E.: “ On the ‘high-indices theorem’ of Hardy and Littlewood”, Quart. J of Math. (Oxford), 8 (1937), 1–7.Google Scholar
5. Karamata, J.: Sur les théorèmes inverses des procédés de sommabilité (“Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles”, No. 450, VI, 1937).Google Scholar
6. Karamata, J. : “Einige Sätze iiber die Rieszschen Mittel”, Acad. R. Serbe Bull. Sci. Math. Nat., A 4 (1938), 121–137 Google Scholar
7. Szász, O. : “Converse theorems of summability for Dirichlet’s series”, Trans. American Math. Soc., 39 (1936), 117–130.Google Scholar