Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:34:32.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Newsom Report—“Half Our Future” A Commentary on Chapter 18: Science and Mathematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Canon D. B. Eperson*
Affiliation:
Christ Church College, Canterbury

Extract

Few could cavil at the general views expressed about the place of mathematics in schools by the writers of the Newsom Report, as most of the ideas have been advocated in many Training Colleges for at least ten years. It is strange, however, to see that the section devoted to mathematics is the second part of Chapter 18 on “Science and Mathematics.” Does not this lend colour to the heresy promulgated by Hogben in “Mathematics for the Million” that the subject is to be valued principally, if not entirely, as the “Handmaid of Science”? Everyone will agree that “Mathematics has much to offer to boys and girls of average ability at the Secondary stage. It has a self-evident usefulness which can be a great advantage in arousing the interest of pupils.” Is it true that the only appeal to such pupils is through experience of the practical utility of mathematics in the world around them—the modern world of technology and science and commerce? Doubtless we need more and better mathematicians in all such activities, but they will not be drawn in any large numbers from these pupils. Numbers, shapes and patterns have an intrinsic fascination of their own that is independent of their practical value. For instance, it might be argued that the fact that “all numbers divisible exactly by 9 have a digit sum that is a multiple of nine” may be of some practical value—it was the basis of the process of “casting out the nines” that was formerly advocated as a quick check on the result of a calculation. Yet the pattern of the “nine-times table” is of aesthetic value as well as an aid to memory. Is the test to discover whether a number is a multiple of 11 of much practical value? Lewis Carroll used it to devise a method of dividing by 11 that depends solely on addition and subtraction, but its real value is the insight into number relations that is gained from demonstrating its validity: it certainly has an appeal to most people as a kind of “mathematical magic.” Do you know the test for discovering whether an amount of money expressed in shillings and pence is divisible exactly by 11?—just add the number of shillings to the number of pence, and if their sum is a multiple of 11, the amount of money is divisible by 11. There is an equally simple test for an amount of money to be exactly divisible by 13—can you find it? Experience shows that facts such as these stimulate the interest of those who dislike arithmetical calculations, whether young people or adults: the film-strip “Alice in Numberland” was designed to undermine the prejudice that many women students have against mathematics, by showing Lewis Carroll’s delight in puzzles and paradoxes, and his humorous approach to Symbolic Logic. Even in Secondary Modern Schools at all levels it should not be forgotten that mathematics can have an “entertainment value” comparable to that of music or any other form of art, if presented in the right way.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)