Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:18:27.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First account on the seasonal occurrence of parasitic forms on the zooplankton of Southampton Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

E. Muxagata  and
J.A. Williams
E. Muxagata*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Laboratório de Zooplâncton, Instituto de Oceanografia, Avenida Itália, km8, Campus Carreiros, Caixa Postal 474, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brazil
J.A. Williams
Affiliation:
School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: E. Muxagata, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Laboratório de Zooplâncton, Instituto de Oceanografia, Avenida Itália, km8, Campus Carreiros, Caixa Postal 474, 96201-900 Rio Grande RS, Brazil, email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In the past half century, a number of studies have described the general composition of the mesozooplankton of Southampton Water, but little attention has been paid to the occurrence of parasitic and commensal species. In order to fill this gap, the occurrence and distribution of parasitic/commensal species was investigated in three fixed stations along the estuary in 2001/2002. A total of 16 parasitic taxa were identified, including 11 new records for the zooplankton of Southampton Water. The most frequent and abundant parasitic taxa observed in the estuary were Peltogaster paguri, Sacculina carcini, Siphonostomatoida copepodites and cryptonistic forms of isopods. This study is the first report on ‘free-forms’ of parasitic/commensal species within the mesozooplankton of Southampton Water being also a reasonable indicator of the presence of the infected/associate host in the estuary or surrounding areas.

Keywords

estuarySouthampton Waterzooplanktonparasitescommensal
Type
Research Article
Information
Marine Biodiversity Records , Volume 4 , December 2011 , e47
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antai, E.E. (1989) Seasonal trophodynamics of bacterioplankton and heterotrophic microflagellates in Southampton Water. PhD thesis. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Boxshall, G.A. (1974) The developmental stages of Lepeophtheirus pectoralis (Müller, 1776) (Copepoda: Caligidae). Journal of Natural History 8, 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxshall, G.A. and Halsey, S.H. (2004) An introduction to copepod diversity. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Boxshall, G.A. and Montú, M.A. (1997) Copepods parasitic on Brazilian coastal fishes: a handbook. Nauplius 5, 1–225.Google Scholar
Castro-Longoria, E. (1998) Seasonal and spatial distribution patterns of the congeneric group Acartia in the Solent–Southampton Water estuarine system, with special reference to aspects of their fecundity. PhD thesis. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Castro-Longoria, E. and Williams, J.A. (1996) First report of the presence of Acartia margalefi (Copepoda: Calanoida) in Southampton Water and Horsea Lake, UK. Journal of Plankton Research 18, 567–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, R.J. (1957) Notes on the seasonal distribution of zooplankton in Southampton Water with special reference to the genus Acartia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 12(10), 64–67.Google Scholar
Dyer, K.R. (1973) Estuaries: a physical introduction. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Evans, N.A., Whitfield, P.J., Bamber, R.N. and Espin, P.N. (1983) Lernaeocera lusci (Copepoda: Pennellidae) on bib (Trisopterus luscus) from Southampton Water. Parasitology 86, 161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotto, V. (1993) Commensal and parasitic copepods associated with marine invertebrates (and whales): keys and notes for the identification of the species. Oegstgeest, The Netherlands: Universal Book Services/Dr W. Backhuys.Google Scholar
Gotto, V. (2004) Synopses of the British Fauna no. 46—Commensal and parasitic copepods associated with marine invertebrates. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council.Google Scholar
Guyard, P.H. (2000) Effects of oceanographic factors on the mesozooplanktonic communities of the East Solent and outer approaches. PhD thesis. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Hansson, H.G. (1998) NEAT (North East Atlantic Taxa): South Scandinavian marine Crustacea check-list. Internet pdf ed. (http://www.tmbl.gu.se), 1–84.Google Scholar
Herbert, R.J.H. and Muxagata, E. (2009) Barnacles (Crustacea: Cirripedia) of the Solent & Isle of Wight. Proceedings of the Isle of Wight Natural History and Archaeological Society 24, 42–56.Google Scholar
Hirst, A.G. (1996) Zooplankton production and energy flow towards a biological model of Southampton Water. PhD thesis. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Hirst, A.G., Sheader, M. and Williams, J.A. (1999) Annual pattern of calanoid copepod abundance, prosome length and minor role in pelagic carbon flux in the Solent, UK. Marine Ecology Progress Series 177, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeg, J.T. (1992) Chapter 6—Rhizocephala. In Harrison, F.W. and Humes, A.G. (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. Volume 9. Crustacea. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc., pp. 313–345.Google Scholar
Howard, A.G., Comber, S.D.W., Kifle, D., Antai, E.E. and Purdie, D.A. (1995) Arsenic speciation and seasonal changes in nutrient availability and micro-plankton abundance in Southampton Water, UK. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 40, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huys, R. and Boxshall, G.A. (1991) Copepod evolution. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Iriarte, A. and Purdie, D.A. (1994) Size distribution of chlorophyll-a biomass and primary production in a temperate estuary (Southampton Water): the contribution of photosynthetic picoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series 115, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, M.J. (1975) Copepoda—Sub-Order: Monstrilloida. Fiches d'Identification du Zooplancton. Fiche 144/145, 1–10.Google Scholar
Isaac, M.J. (1979) Chapter 31. The zooplankton of Swansea Bay. In Collins, M.B., Banner, F.T., Tyler, P.A., Wakefield, S.J. and James, A.E. (eds) Industrialised embayments and their environmental problems. A case study of Swansea Bay. Interdisciplinary Symposium on Industrialised Embayments and their Environmental Problems, Swansea, pp. 487–505.Google Scholar
Isaac, M.J. and Moyse, J. (1990) Crustacea I: Entomostraca. In Hayward, P.J. and Ryland, J.S. (eds) The marine fauna of the British Isles and north-west Europe. Volume 1. Introduction and protozoans to arthropods. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 322–361.Google Scholar
Kabata, Z. (1979) Parasitic Copepoda of british fishes. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Kas'yanov, V.L., Korn, O.M. and Rybakov, A.V. (1998) Reproductive strategy of cirripedes: 3. Embryonic development and early larvae. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 24, 277–286.Google Scholar
Kifle, D. and Purdie, D.A. (1993) The seasonal abundance of the phototrophic ciliate Mesodinium rubrum in Southampton Water, England. Journal of Plankton Research 15, 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, I.-H. (1996) Copepoda of Artotrogidae (Siphonostomatoida) from the Sea of Japan. Korean Journal of Systematic Zoology 12, 397–466.Google Scholar
Leakey, R.J.G., Burkill, P.H. and Sleigh, M.A. (1992) Planktonic ciliates in Southampton Water: abundance, biomass, production, and role in pelagic carbon flow. Marine Biology 114, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, C.H., Hirst, A.G. and Williams, J.A. (1997) Plankton dynamics and Aurelia aurita production in two contrasting ecosystems: comparisons and consequences. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, C.H., Williams, D.W., Williams, J.A. and Sheader, M. (1995) Seasonal dynamics and production of the hydromedusan Clytia hemisphaerica (Hydromedusa: Leptomedusa) in Southampton Water. Estuaries 18, 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.W. and Davis, G.E. (2001) An updated classification of the recent crustacea. Contributions in Science 39, 1–124.Google Scholar
Muxagata, E. (2005) Seasonal and spatial distribution of the mesozooplankton of Southampton Water with particular reference to the contribution of copepods and barnacle larvae to pelagic carbon flux. PhD thesis. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Muxagata, E. and Williams, J.A. (2004) The mesozooplankton of the Solent–Southampton Water system: a photographic guide. Southampton Oceanography Centre Internal Document, No. 97, 103 pp. [Unpublished.]Google Scholar
Muxagata, E. and Williams, J.A. (2011) Larval body size–mass relationships of barnacles common to the English Channel coast of the UK. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 91, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muxagata, E., Williams, J.A. and Sheader, M. (2004) Composition and temporal distribution of cirripede larvae in Southampton Water, England, with particular reference to the secondary production of Elminius modestus. ICES Journal of Marine Science 61, 585–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piasecki, W. (1996) The developmental stages of Caligus elongatus von Nordmann, 1832 (Copepoda: Caligidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, 1459–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymont, J.E.G. and Carrie, B.G.A. (1964) The production of zooplankton in Southampton Water. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 49, 185–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sars, G.O. (1921) An account of the Crustacea of Norway. Volume VIII. Copepoda Monstrilloida and Notodelphyoida. Bergen, Norway: Bergen Museum.Google Scholar
Soares, M.M. (1958) A study of the distribution and abundance of cirripede larvae in Southampton Water. MSc thesis. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Steedman, H.F. (1976) Chapter V. Aldehydes. 1. General and applied data on formaldehyde fixation and preservation of marine zooplankton. In Steedman, H.F. (ed.) Monographs on oceanographic methodology, no. 4. Zooplankton fixation and preservation. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 103–154.Google Scholar
Turquier, Y. (1967) Le développement larvaire de Trypetesa nassaroides Turquier, cirripède acrothoracique. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale 108, 33–47.Google Scholar
Turquier, Y. (1972) Contribution a la connaissance des cirripedes Acrothoraciques. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale 113, 499–551.Google Scholar
Veillet, A. (1943) Existence d'un ‘flotteur’ chez la larvae nauplius de certains Rhizocephales. Bulletin de l'Institut Océanographique 39(845), 1–4.Google Scholar
Williams, J.A. and Muxagata, E. (2006) The seasonal abundance and production of Oithona nana (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) in Southampton Water. Journal of Plankton Research 28, 1055–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar