Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:29:59.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeding habits of the sea turtles Caretta caretta and Lepidochelys olivacea in south-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2015

Ana Paula Madeira Di Beneditto*
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, CBB, Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais, Avenida Alberto Lamego 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, 28013-620, Brazil
Jailson Fulgencio De Moura
Affiliation:
Systems Ecology, Leibniz Center for Tropical Marine Ecology (ZMT), Fahrenheitstrasse 6, Bremen, 28359, Germany
Salvatore Siciliano
Affiliation:
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ, Avenida Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A.P.M. Di Beneditto, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, CBB, Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais, Avenida Alberto Lamego 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, 28013-620, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Studies of the feeding habits of sea turtles are important in identifying their feeding grounds and preferred prey, thus helping with management decisions regarding habitat protection. The present study describes, for the first time, the feeding habits of the sea turtles Caretta caretta and Lepidochelys olivacea in Rio de Janeiro State, south-eastern Brazil (22°06′S–22°55′S). The stomach contents of five C. caretta and five L. olivacea recovered between 2009 and 2010 were analysed to identify the prey species. A common feeding pattern was noted for both species, with bottom-dwelling prey (fish, crustaceans, molluscs and echinoderms), common in shallow environments, constituting the main food items. All fish and brachyuran crustacean species identified in the stomach contents were by-catch in small-scale shrimp fisheries that operate along the study area. The coastal waters of Rio de Janeiro State represent a new feeding ground for L. olivacea, expanding its preferential habitat during the non-reproductive period. The results provide strong evidence for the likelihood that sea turtles are interacting with fisheries due to an overlapping between feeding and fishery grounds. An evaluation of carcasses washed up on beaches is needed for a better understanding of the effects on the population dynamics of sea turtles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baptistotte, C., Thomé, J.C.A. and Bjorndal, K.A. (2003) Reproductive biology and conservation status of the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) in Espírito Santo State, Brazil. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4, 523529.Google Scholar
Bolten, A.B. (2003) Active swimmers – passive drifters: the oceanic juvenile stage of loggerheads in the Atlantic system. In Bolten, A.B. and Witherington, B.E. (eds) Loggerhead sea turtles. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books, pp. 6378.Google Scholar
Colman, L.P., Sampaio, C.L., Weber, M.I. and Castilhos, J.C. (2014) Diet of olive ridley sea turtles, Lepidochelys olivacea, in waters of Sergipe, Brazil. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 13, 266271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, I.D. and Di Beneditto, A.P.M. (2009) Caracterización preliminar de los invertebrados bentónicos capturados accidentalmente em la pesca de camarones en el norte del estado de Rio de Janeiro, sudeste de Brasil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 37, 259264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Beneditto, A.P. and Lima, N.R.W. (2003) Biometria de teleósteos da costa norte do estado do Rio de Janeiro para estudos sobre piscivoria. Biotemas 16, 135144.Google Scholar
Di Beneditto, A.P.M., Souza, G.V.C., Tudesco, C.C. and Kloh, A.S. (2010) Records of brachyuran crabs as by-catch from the coastal shrimp fishery in northern Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Marine Biodiversity Records 3, doi: 10.1017/S1755267210000679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eschscholtz, J.F. (1829) Zoologischer atlas enthaltend abbildungen und beschreibungen neuer thierarten, 1st edn.Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Frick, M.G., Williams, K.L., Bolten, A.B., Bjorndal, K.A. and Martins, H.R. (2009) Foraging ecology of oceanic-stage loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta. Endangered Species Research 9, 9197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (2015) FishBase. Available at: http://www.fishbase.org (accessed 15 January 2015).Google Scholar
Hamann, M., Godfrey, M.H., Seminoff, J.A., Arthur, K., Barata, P.C.R., Bjorndal, K.A., Bolten, A.B., Broderick, A.C., Campbell, L.M., Carreras, C., Casale, P., Chaloupka, M., Chan, S.K.F., Coyne, M.S., Crowder, L.B., Diez, C.E., Dutton, P.H., Epperly, S.P., Fitzsimmons, N.N., Formia, A., Girondot, M., Hays, G.C., Cheng, I.J., Kaska, Y., Lewinson, R., Mortimer, J.A., Nichols, W.J., Reina, R.D., Shanker, K., Spotila, J.R., Tomás, J., Wallace, B.P., Work, T.M., Zbinden, J. and Godley, B.J. (2010) Global research priorities for sea turtles: informing management and conservation in the 21st Century. Endangered Species Research 11, 245269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Garcia, V. (1995) The diet of the swordfish Xiphias gladius Linnaeus, 1758, in the central east Atlantic, with emphasis on the role of cephalopods. Fishery Bulletin 93, 403411.Google Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature – IUCN (2015) Red List of Threatened Species, version 2014.3. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 09 March 2015).Google Scholar
Limpus, C.J., Limpus, D.J., Horton, M. and Ferris, L. (2008) Loggerhead turtle mortality from attempted ingestion of porcupine fish. Marine Turtle Newsletter 120, 13.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema naturae per regna tria natirae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, 10th edn.Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
Marcovaldi, M.A. and Chaloupka, M. (2007) Conservation status of the loggerhead sea turtle in Brazil: an encouraging outlook. Endangered Species Research 3, 133143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márquez, M.R. (1990) Sea turtles of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of sea turtle species known to date. In Fischer, W. and Scialabba, N. (eds) FAO species catalogue. Rome: FAO, pp. 181.Google Scholar
Morais, R.A., Longo, G.O., Santos, R.A., Yoshida, E.T.E., Stahelin, G.D. and Horta, P.A. (2012) Cephalopod ingestion by juvenile green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas): predatory or scavenging behavior? Herpetological Review 43, 4750.Google Scholar
Musick, J.A. and Limpus, C.J. (1997) Habitat utilization and migration in juvenile sea turtles. In Lutz, P.L. and Musick, J.A. (eds) The biology of sea turtles. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 137164.Google Scholar
Plotkin, P.T. (2010) Nomadic behaviour of the highly migratory olive ridley turtle Lepidochelys olivacea in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Endangered Species Research 13, 3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polovina, J.J., Balazs, G.H., Howell, E.A., Parker, D.M., Seki, M.P. and Dutton, P.H. (2004) Forage and migration habitat of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtles in the central North Pacific Ocean. Fisheries Oceanography 13, 3651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichart, H.A. (1993) Synopsis of biological data on the olive ridley sea turtle Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz 1829) in the western Atlantic. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-SEFSC 336, 78 pp.Google Scholar
Reis, E.C., Moura, J.F., Lima, L.M., Rennó, B. and Siciliano, S. (2010) Evidence of migratory movements of olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) along the Brazilian coast. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 58, 255259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, E.C., Silveira, V.V. and Siciliano, S. (2009) Records of stranded sea turtles on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Marine Biodiversity Records 2, doi: 10.1017/S1755267209001262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sales, G., Giffoni, B.G. and Barata, P.C.R. (2008) Incidental catch of sea turtles by the Brazilian pelagic longline fishery. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 88, 853864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salman, A. and Karakulak, F.S. (2009) Cephalopods in the diet of albacore, Thunnus alalunga, from the eastern Mediterranean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 635640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seney, E.E. and Musick, J.A. (2007) Historical diet analysis of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in Virginia. Copeia 2, 478489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, A.C.C.D., Castilhos, J.C., Lopez, G.G. and Barata, P.C.R. (2007) Nesting biology and conservation of the olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) in Brazil, 1991/1992 to 2002/2003. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 10471056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, A.C.C.D., Santos, E.A.P., Oliveira, F.L.C., Weber, M.I., Batista, J.A.F., Serafini, T.Z. and Castilhos, J.C. (2011) Satellite tracking reveals multiple foraging strategies and threats for olive ridley turtles in Brazil. Marine Ecology Progress Series 443, 237247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomás, J., Aznar, F.J. and Raga, J.A. (2001) Feeding ecology of the loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta in the western Mediterranean. Journal of Zoology 255, 525532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, B.P., Kot, C.Y., Dimatteo, A.D., Lee, T., Crowder, L.B. and Lewison, R.L. (2013) Impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine turtle populations worldwide: toward conservation and research priorities. Ecosphere 4, doi: org/10.1890/ES12-00388.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildermann, N.E. and Barrios-Garrido, H. (2012) First report of Callinectes sapidus (Decapoda: Portunidae) in the diet of Lepidochelys olivacea. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 11, 265268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R.E. and Roper, C.F.E. (2011) Chiroteuthidae Gray, 1849. Tree of Life web project. Available at: http://tolweb.org/Chiroteuthidae/19451/2011.11.22 (accessed 22 November 2011).Google Scholar