Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:30:20.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences in interspecific associations of initial and terminal phase parrotfish in north-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Roberta Martini Bonaldo  and
Joao Paulo Krajewski
Roberta Martini Bonaldo*
Affiliation:
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia Departamento de Zoologia e Museu de História Natural, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil
Joao Paulo Krajewski
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoologia e Museu de História Natural, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: R.M. Bonaldo, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study compared the frequency with which different parrotfish individuals—initial (IP) and terminal (TP)—of three species associate with cleaner and follower species at Fernando de Noronha Archipelago. Only TP individuals posed at bottom-based cleaning stations. IP individuals were followed more often by the Noronha wrasse (Thalassoma noronhanum) than TP parrotfish. When following parrotfish, the Noronha wrasse capitalized upon drifting particles and occasionally cleaned them ‘on the move’ when they momentarily interrupted their feeding. Probably IP individuals were followed more often by the Noronha wrasse because they forage more often than the TP and thus make more drifting particles available to the wrasse. Since the IP individuals were cleaned by T. noronhanum while foraging, they visit cleaning stations less often than TP individuals.

Keywords

parrotfishcleaning symbiosisfollowing associationSparisomaThalassoma noronhanum
Type
Research Article
Information
Marine Biodiversity Records , Volume 1 , January 2008 , e87
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altman, J. (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 227–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, R.B. and Sanderson, S.L. (1987) Benefits of heterospecific foraging by the Caribbean wrasse, Halichoeres garnoti (Pisces: Labridae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 18, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonaldo, R.M., Krajewski, J.P., Sazima, C. and Sazima, I. (2006) Foraging activity and resource use by three parrotfish species at Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, tropical West Atlantic. Marine Biology 149, 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bshary, R. (2003) The cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus, is a key organism for reef fish diversity at Ras Mohammed National Park, Egypt. Journal of Animal Ecology 72, 169–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choat, J.H. (1991) The biology of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. In Sale, P.F. (ed.) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 120–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floeter, S.R., Vazquez, D.P. and Grutter, A.S. (2007) The macroecology of marine cleaning mutualisms. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francini-Filho, R.B., Moura, R.L. and Sazima, I. (2000) Cleaning by the wrasse Thalassoma noronhanum, with two records of predation by its grouper client Cephalopholis fulva. Journal of Fish Biology 56, 802–809.Google Scholar
Grutter, A.S. (1999) Cleaner fish really do clean. Nature, London 398, 672–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grutter, A.S. and Bshary, R. (2004) Cleaner fish, Labroides dimidiatus, diet preferences for different types of mucus and parasitic gnathiid isopods. Animal Behavior 68, 583–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grutter, A.S., Murphy, J.M. and Choat, J.H. (2003) Cleaner fish drives local fish diversity on coral reefs. Current Biology 16, 64–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, T.P., Bellwood, D.R., Folke, C., Steneck, R.S. and Wilson, J. (2005) New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukoschek, V. and McCormick, M.I. (2002) A review of multispecies foraging associations in fishes and their ecological significance. In Proceedings of the 9th International Coral Reef Symposium, Okinawa, July 2004, pp. 467–474.Google Scholar
Robertson, D.R. and Warner, R.R. (1978) Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the Western Caribbean, II: the parrotfishes. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 225, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sazima, C., Bonaldo, R.M., Krajewski, J.P. and Sazima, I. (2005) The Noronha wrasse: a jack-of-all-trades follower. Aqua Journal of Ichthyology and Aquatic Biology 9, 97–108.Google Scholar
Sazima, C., Krajewski, J.P., Bonaldo, R.M. and Sazima, I. (2007) Nuclear-follower foraging associations of reef fishes and other animals at an oceanic archipelago. Environmental Biology of Fishes, doi 10.1007/s10641-006-9123-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, S. (1988) Following behavior: interspecific foraging associations among Gulf of California reef fishes. Copeia 1988, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. (2005) The geographic mosaic of co-evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooij, J.M., Jong, E., Vaandrager, F. and Videler, J.J. (1996a) Resource and habitat shared by the stoplight parrotfish, Sparisoma viride, a Caribbean reef herbivore. Environmental Biology of Fishes 47, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooij, J.M., Kroon, F.J. and Videler, J.J. (1996b) The social and mating system of the herbivorous reef fish and Sparisoma viride: one-male versus multi-male groups. Environmental Biology of Fishes 47, 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar