Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:02:24.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New record and biological features of the commensal porcellanid crab Polyonyx gibbesi (Crustacea: Anomura) from the north-eastern Brazilian coast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2012

Gustavo Luis Hirose
Gustavo Luis Hirose*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Carcinologia, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: G.L. Hirose, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Avenida Marechall Rondon s/n, Bairro Rosa Elze, CEP: 49100 000, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Polyonyx gibbesi—commonly known as the porcelain crab—lives commensally with an annelid that builds U-shaped tubes in shallow waters along the Atlantic coast. Polyonyx gibbesi is considered to have a mostly anti-tropical distribution, since it has been found only sporadically in tropical waters (e.g. the Caribbean). A total of 27 tubes of the polychaete host were collected from the estuarine mudflat of the Vaza-Barris River, State of Sergipe, Brazil; 23 of these tubes were inhabited by at least one individual of P. gibbesi. In the hosts examined, 42 crabs were found (21 males and 21 females). A total of four hosts harboured a single commensal crab. In all cases in which more than one crab was found per host, they were a male and female pair. A total of five females were recorded carrying eggs (1171.6 ± 534.5). The frequency of P. gibbesi in the host was high (about 85%), suggesting that the occurrence of this porcelain crab was not accidental or sporadic at the study site. The presence of ovigerous females in the population further indicates the existence of mature and sexually active individuals, which are effectively reproducing. The expansion of the known distribution of P. gibbesi to the State of Sergipe in Brazil challenges the current idea of an anti-tropical distribution for P. gibbesi. Most probably, the current status of knowledge about this species' distribution is the result of its commensal lifestyle, which makes it difficult to collect, and also the paucity of investigations along the north-eastern Brazilian coast.

Keywords

PolychaeteChaetopterussymbiosis
Type
Research Article
Information
Marine Biodiversity Records , Volume 5 , August 2012 , e43
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amaral, A.C.Z. and Nonato, F.E. (1996) Annelida Polychaeta: características, glossário e chaves para famílias e gêneros da costa brasileira. Campinas, SP: Editora da UNICAMP, 124 pp.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A. (2008) Social monogamy in the shrimp Pontonia margarita, a symbiont of Pinctada mazatlantica, in the tropical eastern Pacific coast. Marine Biology 153, 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeza, J.A., Bolaños, J., Hernandez, J.E., Lira, C. and Lópes, R. (2011) Monogamy does not last long in Pontonia mexicana, a symbiotic shrimp of the amber pen-shell Pinna carnea from the southeastern Caribbean Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 407, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Piantoni, C. (2010) Sexual system, sex ratio, and group living in the shrimp Thor amboinensis (De Man): relevance to resource-monopolization and sex-allocation theories. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 219, 151–165.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Stotz, W.B. (1995) Estrutura poblacional del cangrejo comensal Allopetrolisthes spinifrons (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) (Decapoda: Porcellanidae) sobre su hospedador habitual Phymactis clematis (Actiniaria) y em dos nuevos hospedadores. Revista de Biología Marinha 30, 255–264.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A., Stotz, W. and Thiel, M. (2001) Life history of Allopetrolisthes spinifrons, a crab associate of the sea anemone Phymactis clematis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Thiel, M. (2003) Predicting territorial behavior in symbiotic crabs using host characteristics: a comparative study and proposal of a model. Marine Biology 142, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Thiel, M. (2007) The mating system of symbiotic crustaceans: a conceptual model based on optimality and ecological constraints. In Duffy, J.E. and Thiel, M. (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustaceans as model organisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 250–267.Google Scholar
Belleggia, M., Boschi, E.E., Schejter, L., Bremec, C., Sánchez, F. and Figueroa, D.E. (2010) First record of Polyonyx gibbesi (Anomura: Porcellanidae) in the Argentine Sea. Marine Biodiversity Records 3, 1–3. DOI: 10.1017/S1755267209991011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, R.H. and Abele, L.G. (1976) Shallow water porcelain crabs from the Pacific coast of Panama and adjacent Caribbean waters (Crustacea: Anomura: Porcellanidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 237, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, I.E. (1961) Changes in abundance of the commensal crabs of Chaetopterus. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 120, 353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, M.W. and Woodin, S.A. (1996) Conspecific recognition and host choice in a pea crab, Pinnixa chaetopterana (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 190, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, J. (1960) The Porcellanidae (Crustacean, Anomura) of the eastern Pacific. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions 24, 1–440.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, I.T., Hernándes, G. and Felder, D. (2005) Review of the Western Atlantic Porcellanidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura) with new records, systematic observations, and comments on biogeography. Caribbean Journal of Science 41, 544–582.Google Scholar
Ross, D.M. (1983) Symbiotic relations. In Abele, L.G. (ed.) The biology of Crustacea. New York: Academic Press, pp. 163–212.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edition. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Thiel, M., Zander, A., Valdivia, N., Baeza, J.A. and Rueffler, C. (2003) Host fidelity of a symbiotic porcellanid crab: the importance of host characteristics. Journal of Zoology, London 261, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vannini, M. (1985) A shrimp that speaks crab-ese. Journal of Crustacean Biology 5, 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar