Article contents
First record of Beroe gracilis Künne, 1939 (Ctenophora: Beroida: Beroidae) from Norway, found in a Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz, 1865 bloom
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2015
Abstract
In September 2014 an unusual mixture of ctenophores was recorded at Arboretet, south-western Norway and at Flødevigen, near Arendal on the south coast of Norway. In addition to the invasive American lobate ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi, the common northern lobate ctenophore Bolinopsis infundibulum and the cydippid Pleurobrachia pileus, two beroid ctenophores, were noted – Beroe cucumis and Beroe gracilis. The latter species had not been documented before in Norwegian waters.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015
References
REFERENCES
Båmstedt, U. (1998) Trophodynamics of Pleurobrachia pileus (Ctenophora, cydippida) and ctenophore summer occurrence off the Norwegian north-west coast. Sarsia 83, 169–181.Google Scholar
CIESM (2015) Report of the Joint CIESM/ICES Workshop on Mnemiopsis Science. In Pitois, S. and Shiganova, T. (eds) 18–20 September 2014, A Coruña, Spain, 80 pp. Available at: http://www.ciesm.org/CIESM2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dahl, E., Lindahl, O., Paasche, E. and Throndsen, J. (1989) The Chrysochromulina polylepis bloom in scandinavian waters during spring 1988. Novel Phytoplankton Blooms 35, 383–405.Google Scholar
Dinasquet, J., Titelman, J., Møller, L.F., Setälä, O., Granhag, L., Andersen, T., Båmstedt, U., Haraldsson, M., Hosia, A., Katajisto, T., Kragh, T., Kuparinen, J., Schrøter, M.-L., Søndergaard, M., Tiselius, P. and Riemann, L. (2012) Cascading effects of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi on the planktonic food web in a nutrient-limited estuarine system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 460, 49–61.Google Scholar
Edvardsen, B., Eikrem, W., Throndsen, J., Sáez, A.G., Probert, I. and Medlin, L.K. (2011) Ribosomal DNA phylogenies and a morphological revision provide the basis for a revised taxonomy of the Prymnesiales (Haptophyta). European Journal of Phycology 46, 202–228.Google Scholar
Falkenhaug, T. and Stabell, O. (1996) Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in Ctenophores. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 27, 249–260.Google Scholar
Finenko, G.A., Romanova, Z.A., Abolmasova, G.I., Anninsky, B.E., Svetlichny, L.S., Hubareva, E.S., Bat, L. and Kideys, A.E. (2003) Population dynamics, ingestion, growth and reproduction rates of the invader Beroe ovata and its impact on plankton community in Sevastopol Bay, the Black Sea. Journal of Plankton Research 25, 539–549.Google Scholar
Gederaas, L., Salvesen, I. and Viken, Å. (eds) (2007) Norsk svarteliste 2007 – Økologiske risikovurderinger av fremmede arter. In 2007 Norwegian Black List – Ecological Risk Analysis of Alien Species. Norway: Artsdatabanken, 152 pp.Google Scholar
Gorsky, G., Flood, P.R., Youngbluth, M., Picheral, M. and Grisoni, J.-M. (2000) Zooplankton distribution in four Western Norwegian fjords. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 50, 129–135.Google Scholar
Greve, W. (1975). Ctenophora. In Fiches d'identification du zooplancton, 146. Copenhagen: ICES, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Greve, W. (1981) Invertebrate predator control in a coastal ecosystem: the significance of Beroe gracilis (Ctenophora). Kieler Meeresforschungen Sonderh 5, 211–217.Google Scholar
Greve, W., Stockner, J. and Fulton, J. (1976) Towards a theory of specialization in Beroe. In Mackie, G.O. (ed.) Coelenterate ecology and behavior. New York: Springer, pp. 231–258.Google Scholar
Hansson, H.G. (2006) Ctenophores of the Baltic and adjacent seas – the invader Mnemiopsis is here! Aquatic Invasions 1, 295–298.Google Scholar
Hosia, A. and Båmstedt, U. (2007) Seasonal changes in the gelatineous zooplankton community and hydromedusa abundances in Korsfjord and Fanafjord, western Norway. Marine Ecology Progress Series 351, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosia, A. and Titelman, J. (2011) Intraguild predation between the native North Sea jellyfish Cyanea capillata and the invasive ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. Journal of Plankton Research 33, 535–540.Google Scholar
Hosia, A., Titelman, J., Hansson, L.J. and Haraldsson, M. (2011) Interactions between native and alien ctenophores: Beroe gracilis and Mnemiopsis leidyi in Gullmarsfjorden. Marine Ecology Progress Series 422, 129–138.Google Scholar
Javidpour, J., Sommer, U. and Shiganova, T.A. (2006) First record of Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz, 1865 in the Baltic Sea. Aquatic Invasions 1, 299–302.Google Scholar
Kramp, P.L. and Damas, D. (1925) Les Méduses de la Norvège. Introduction et Partie spéciale I. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 80, 217–323.Google Scholar
Kube, S., Postel, L., Honnef, C. and Augustin, C.B. (2007) Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Baltic Sea – distribution and overwintering between Autumn 2006 and spring 2007. Aquatic Invasions 2, 137–145.Google Scholar
Künne, C. (1939) Die Beroe (Ctenophora) der südlichen Nordsee, Beroe gracilis n. sp. Zoologischer Anzeiger 127, 172–174.Google Scholar
Majaneva, S. and Majaneva, M. (2013) Cyddipid ctenophores in the coastal waters of Svalbard: is it only Mertensia ovum? Polar Biology 36, 1681–1686.Google Scholar
Medlin, L., Elwood, H.J., Stickel, S. and Sogin, M.L. (1988) The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 71, 491–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, C.E. and Haddock, S.H.D. (2007) Ctenophora. In Carlton, J.T. (ed.) The Light and Smith's manual. Intertidal invertebrates off the central California Coast, 4th edn.USA: University of California Press, 198 pp.Google Scholar
Muller, Y. (2004) Faune et flore du littoral du Nord, du Pas-de-Calais et de la Belgique: inventaire. [Coastal fauna and flora of the Nord, Pas-de-Calais and Belgium: inventory.] France: Commission Régionale de Biologie Région Nord Pas-de-Calais, 307 pp.Google Scholar
Oliveira, O.M.P. (2007) The presence of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Oslofjorden and considerations on the initial invasion pathways to the North and Baltic Seas. Aquatic Invasions 2, 185–189.Google Scholar
Oliveira, O.M.P., Feliú, G. and Palma, S. (2014) Beroe gracilis (Ctenophora) from the Humboldt Current System: first occurrence of this species in the southern hemisphere. Zootaxa 3827, 397–400.Google Scholar
Pagès, F., Gonzalez, H. and Gonzalez, S. (1996) Diet of the gelatinous zooplankton in Hardangerfjord (Norway) and potential predatory impact by Aglantha digitale (Trachymedusae). Marine Ecology Progress Series 139, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podar, M., Haddock, S.H., Sogin, M.L. and Harbison, G.R. (2001) A molecular phylogenetic framework for the phylum Ctenophora using 18S rRNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21, 218–230.Google Scholar
Purcell, J.E. and Cowan, J.H. (1995) Predation by the scyphomedusan Chrysaora quinquecirrha on Mnemiopsis leidyi ctenophores. Marine Ecology Progress Series 129, 63–70.Google Scholar
Riisgård, H.U. and Goldstein, J. (2014) Jellyfish and Ctenophores in Limfjorden (Denmark) – mini-review, with recent new observations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2, 593–615.Google Scholar
Schlüter, M.H., Merico, A., Reginatto, M., Boersma, M., Wiltshire, K.H. and Greve, W. (2010) Phenological shifts of three interacting zooplankton groups in relation to climate change. Global Change Biology 16, 3144–3153.Google Scholar
Shiganova, T.A., Dumont, H.J.D., Mikaelyan, A.S., Glazov, D.M., Bulgakova, Y.V., Musaeva, E.I., Sorokin, P.Y., Pautova, L.A., Mirzoyan, Z.A. and Studenikina, E.I. (2004) Interaction between the invading Ctenophores Mnemiopsis leidyi (A. Agassiz) and Beroe ovata Mayer 1912, and their influence on the pelagic ecosystem of the northeastern Black Sea. In Dumont, H., Shiganova, T. and Niermann, U. (eds) The aquatic invasions in the Black, Caspian and Mediterranean seas. NATO ASI Series 2, Environment. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 33–70.Google Scholar
Shiganova, T.A., Legendre, L., Kazmin, A.S. and Nival, P. (2014a) Interactions between invasive ctenophores in the Black Sea: assessment of control mechanisms based on long-term observations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 507, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiganova, T.A., Riisgård, H.U., Ghabooli, S. and Tendal, O.S. (2014b) First report on Beroe ovata in an unusual mixture of ctenophores in the Great Belt (Denmark). Aquatic Invasions 9, 111–116.Google Scholar
Sørnes, T.A. and Aksnes, D.L. (2004) Predation efficiency in visual and tactile planktivores. Limnology and Oceanography 49, 69–75.Google Scholar
Strømgren, T. (1973) Zooplankton investigations in Trondheimsfjorden, 1963–1966. Kongelige Norske videnskabers selskab Museet Miscellanea 13, 1–149.Google Scholar
Swanberg, N. and Båmstedt, U. (1991) Ctenophora in the Arctic: the abundance, distribution and predatory impact of the cydippid ctenophore Mertensia ovum (Fabricius) in the Barents Sea. Polar Research 10, 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilves, U., Purcell, J.E., Marambio, M., Canepa, A., Olariaga, A. and Fuentes, V. (2012) Predation by the scyphozoan Pelagia noctiluca on Mnemiopsis leidyi ctenophores in the NW Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Plankton Research 35, 218–224.Google Scholar
Wrobel, D. and Mills, C. (2003) Pacific coast pelagic invertebrates: a guide to the common gelatinous animals. Monterey, California: Sea Challengers and the Monterey Bay Aquarium, 109 pp.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by