Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:56:34.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nordic Corporate Governance Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

Steen Thomsen
Steen Thomsen*
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Nordic countries – Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland—have attracted attention in recent years. Some elements of the Nordic model—particularly the welfare state—are well understood, but its governance characteristics remain elusive to the international audience. This article reviews Nordic governance and discusses its relevance as a development paradigm. The article quantitatively documents the existence of a Nordic governance model using data from the World Bank, Transparency International and other sources. Secondly, it is shown how Nordic corporate governance – Nordic civil law, concentrated ownership, semi two-tier board structures, employee representation and low-powered managerial incentives – has been shaped by the welfare state in ways consistent with systemic corporate governance theories. The article concludes with a skeptical discussion of the Nordic model as a development paradigm.

Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 189 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A., & Verdier, T. 2012. Can't we all be more like Nordics? Asymmetric growth and institutions in an interdependent world. NBER Working Paper 18441, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alestalo, M., Hort, S. E. O., & Kuhnle, S. 2009. The Nordic model: Conditions, origins, outcomes, lessons. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Andersen, T. M., Holmström, B., Honkapohja, S., Korkman, S., Söderström, H. T., Vartiainen, J. 2007. The Nordic model - Embracing globalization and sharing risk, Working paper, http://economics.mit.edu/files/5726.Google Scholar
Barton, D., & Wiseman, M. 2014. Focusing capital on the long term. Harvard Business Review. [Cited 22 June 2015]. Available from URL: https://hbr.org/2014/01/focusing-capital-on-the-long-term Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. 1899. The preconditions of socialism, Dietz, J. H. W., Stuttgart 1899, reprinted. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Børsting, C., Kuhn, J., Poulsen, T., Thomsen, S. 2014a. Industrial foundations as long-term owners. Unpublished Working Paper, The research project on industrial foundations.Google Scholar
Børsting, C., Kuhn, J., Poulsen, T., Thomsen, S. 2014b. The governance of industrial foundations: Executive and director turnover. Unpublished Working Paper, The research project on industrial foundations.Google Scholar
Børsting, C., Kuhn, J., Poulsen, T., Thomsen, S. 2014c. The performance of Danish foundation-owned companies. Unpublished Working Paper, The research project on industrial foundations.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C. 2001. Do norms matter? A cross-country evaluation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149: 2151–2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist . 2013. The next supermodel. [Cited 22 June 2015]. Available from URL: http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21571136-politicians-both-right-and-left-could-learn-nordic-countries-next-supermodel Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 2011. The origins of political order. London, UK: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 2014. Political order & political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. L. 2003. Nordic company law: The regulation of public companies in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. Copenhagen: Djoef Publishing.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. L. 2007. A Scandinavian approach to corporate governance. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 50: 125–142.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H., & Thomsen, S. 2012. Virtual ownership and managerial distance: The governance of industrial foundations. [Cited 22 June 2015].]. Available from URL: http://www.tifp.dk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Hansmann-Thomsen-21.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, J. 1999. Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6 (1): 41–56.Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. D. 2014. World Happiness Report. [Cited 22 June 2015].Available from URL: http://unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/WorldHappinessReport2013_online.pdf Google Scholar
Hermann, M., & Franke, G. 2002. Performance and policy of foundation-owned firms in Germany. European Financial Management, 8 (3): 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J. 2012. The Kay Review of UK equity markets and long-term decision making. Final Report [Cited 22 June 2015]. Available from URL: http://www.ecgi.org/conferences/eu_actionplan2013/documents/kay_review_final_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Kvist, J., & Greve, B. 2011. Has the Nordic welfare model been transformed? Social Policy and Administration, 45 (2): 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lekvall et al. 2014. The Nordic Corporate Governance Model, SNS Förlag, Stockholm, December 2014; Nordic & European Company Law. Working Paper No. 14-12. Available at from URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2534331.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. 1919. Founding of the Communist International. Lenin's Collected Works, 4th English Edition, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1972 Volume 28, pages 480–484. Uploaded to https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/mar/06.htm.Google Scholar
Mao, T. On Khrushchov's Phoney Communism and Its Historical Lessons for the World: Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (IX). Foreign Languages Press, Peking 1964. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/1964/phnycom.htm Google Scholar
Mayer, C. 2013. Firm commitment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, C., & Thomsen, S. YEAR. Uddelinger og Omkostninger I danske Fonde. Working paper, The Research Project on Industrial Foundations. [Cited DATE]. Available from URL: http://www.tifp.dk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Danske-Fondes-uddelinger-og-omkostninger-VI-12.pdf.Google Scholar
Roe, M. J. 2000. Political preconditions to separating ownership from corporate control. Stanford Law Review, 53: 539–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, M. J. 2003. Political determinants of corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sejersted, F. 2011. The age of social democracy: Norway and Sweden in the twentieth century. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, I., Thomsen, S., & Yeong, G. 2014. The state as shareholder. The case of Singapore. Center for Governance, Institutions and Organizations. NUS Business School. [Cited DATE]. Available from URL: http://bschool.nus.edu/Portals/0/docs/FinalReport_SOE_1July2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. 2014. Leaders and followers: Perspectives on the Nordic Model and the Economics of Innovation. NBER Working Paper 20493, September 2014.Google Scholar
Thomsen, S. 1996. Foundation ownership and economic performance. Corporate governance: An international review, 4 (4): 212–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, S. 1999. Corporate ownership by industrial foundations. The European Journal of Law and Economics, 7 (2): 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, S. 2006. Industrial foundations - foundation ownership of business companies. In Prewitt, K., Dogan, M., Heydemann, S., & Toepler, S. (Eds.), The legitimacy of philanthropic foundations: 236–251. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Steen. 2011. Trust ownership of the Tata Group (December 22, 2011). Available at URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1976958 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1976958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, S. 2012. What do we know about industrial foundations? Working Paper, The Research Project On Industrial Foundations. Available at URL: http://www.tifp.dk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/What-Do-We-Know-about-Industrial-Foundations.pdf.Google Scholar
Thomsen, S. 2012. Industrial Foundations in the Danish Economy. Working Paper, The Research Project On Industrial Foundations. Available at URL: http://www.tifp.dk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Industrial-Foundations-and-Danish-Society1.pdf.Google Scholar
Thomsen, S., & Conyon, M. 2012. Corporate governance: Mechanisms and systems. New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
Thomsen, S., & Rose, C. 2004. Foundation ownership and financial performance. The European Journal of Law and Economics, 18 (3): 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. 1990. Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Institute for International Economics, Conference Volume. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar