Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:10:48.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional Transformation and Changing Networking Patterns in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2016

Jianjun Zhang ,
Wei Zhao  and
Yanlong Zhang
Jianjun Zhang*
Affiliation:
Peking University, China
Wei Zhao
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA Shanghai University, China
Yanlong Zhang
Affiliation:
Peking University, China
*
Corresponding author: Jianjun Zhang ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing insights from the institutional embeddedness perspective, this article explores the changing patterns and significance of two types of strategic networking along with the institutional transformation in China. Using two-wave survey data on Chinese private firms, we find that after the state relaxed its control of resources the importance of networking with the state tends to decline, while ties with market actors become increasingly important. Determinants of network investment have shifted from managers’ perceived importance of different types of network ties to a firm's immediate institutional environment. Finally, the impact of networking on firm growth has also altered over time. These findings advance our understanding of the crucial role of the institutional environment in shaping firms’ networking strategies and have important theoretical and practical implications.

摘要:

摘要:

借鉴制度嵌入视角的见解, 本文探讨了伴随中国制度转型的两种战略人际网络的变化模式和意义。利用中国私企两波调查数据, 我们发现, 在国家放宽了资源控制之后, 与国家的人际网络的重要性趋于下降, 而与市场参与者的联系变得越来越重要。人际网络投资的决定因素已经从管理者所感知的不同类型网络关系的重要性转移到企业直接的体制环境。最后, 人际网络对企业成长的影响也随着时间的推移而改变。这些研究结果促进我们了解制度环境塑造企业人际网络战略的关键作用, 具有重要的理论和实践意义。

संस्थागत अंतःस्थापना (इंस्टीट्यूशनल एम्बेडेडनेस) परिप्रेक्ष्य के आधार पर यह शोध पत्र संस्थागत रूपांतरण और दो प्रकार के सामाजिक कूटनीतिक संजालों (स्ट्रैटेजिक सोशल नेटवर्क) का अन्वेषण करता है. चीनी फर्मों के द्वितरंगीय आंकड़ों के आधार पर हमने यह पाया की राज्य के संसाधनों पर नियंत्रण घटने पर सामाजिक संजालों का प्रभाव कम हो जाता है और साथ ही बाजारपरक शक्तियां उत्तरोत्तर महत्त्वपूर्ण होती जाती हैं. संजालीय निवेशों का आधार प्रबंधकों द्वारा अनुमानित विभिन्न प्रकार के संजालों के महत्व के बजाय फर्म का सन्निकट संस्थागत परिवेश हो गया है. साथ ही संजालों का फर्म के प्रवर्धन में प्रभाव समय के साथ बदलता दिखता है. यह शोध परिणाम सांस्थानिक परिवेश में संजाल कूटनीति पर अहम प्रभाव को उजागर करते हैं. इन परिणामों का महत्त्वपूर्ण सैद्धांतिक और व्यावहारिक आशय है.

Desenvolvendo percepções a partir da perspectiva da integração institucional, este artigo explora as mudanças nos padrões e no significado de dois tipos de conexão estratégica em redes (guanxi) juntamente com a transformação institucional na China. Usando dados de pesquisa de empresas privadas chinesas em dois momentos, descobrimos que depois que o estado reduziu seu controle sobre recursos, a importância do relacionamento em rede com o Estado tende a diminuir, enquanto que os laços com os agentes de mercado tornam-se cada vez mais importantes. Os determinantes do investimento em relacionamento em redes mudaram da importância percebida pelos gestores de diferentes tipos de laços com a rede para o ambiente institucional imediato da empresa. Finalmente, o impacto do relacionamento em redes sobre o crescimento da firma também se alterou ao longo do tempo. Esses achados avançam nossa compreensão sobre o papel crucial do ambiente institucional na formulação de estratégias de conexão das empresas e têm implicações teóricas e práticas importantes

Аннотация:

Аннотация:

На основании теории институциональной принадлежности, данное исследование посвящено тому, насколько структура и значимость двух типов стратегических связей меняется в зависимости от институциональной трансформации в Китае. Используя данные двух-ступенчатого опроса китайских частных компаний, мы обнаруживаем, что после ослабления государственного контроля над ресурсами важность взаимодействия с государством уменьшается, в то время как связи с рыночными игроками становятся все более значимыми. Определяющим фактором для развития связей становится непосредственная институциональная среда компании, а не восприятие менеджерами важности тех или иных связей. Наконец, влияние связей на развитие компании также меняется с течением времени. Эти выводы проясняют важную роль институциональной среды в формировании стратегических связей, а также имеют важное теоретическое и практическое значение.

Esbozando interiorizaciones de la perspectiva de integración institucional, este artículo explora los patrones cambiantes y el significado de dos tipos de relacionamiento estratégico en redes junto con la transformación institucional en China. Usando datos de una encuesta de dos ondas en empresas privadas Chinas, encontramos que después que el Estado disminuyó el control de los recursos la importancia de relacionamiento en redes tiende a disminuir, mientras que los nexos con actores del mercado se vuelven cada vez más importantes. Los determinantes de la inversión en relacionamiento en redes han mutado de la importancia percibida por los gerentes de distintos tipos de vínculos a la red hacia el ambiente institucional inmediato de la empresa. Finalmente, el impacto del relacionamiento en redes en el crecimiento de una empresa se ha modificado con el tiempo. Estos hallazgos avanzan nuestro entendimiento del importante rol del ambiente institucional en la conformación de las estrategias de relacionamiento en red de las empresas y tiene importantes implicaciones teóricas y prácticas.

Keywords

institutional theorysocial networkstransitional economy
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 303 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, W. E., Faulkner, R. R., & Fisher, G. A. 1998. Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships. American Sociological Review, 63 (2): 147–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour, F. 2007. You say guanxi, I say schmoozing: How East is meeting West and building a Lingua Franca of business connections. Business Week , (November 19), [Cited 23 April 2015.] Available from URL: www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_47/b4059066.htm.Google Scholar
Cai, H., Fang, H., & Xu, C. 2011. Eat, drink, firms, and governments: An investigation of corruption from entertainment expenditures in Chinese firms, Journal of Law and Economics, 54 (1): 55–78.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Chen, X. P., & Huang, S. 2013. Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9 (1): 167–207.Google Scholar
Child, J. 1994. Management in China during the age of reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. 2011. How organizations engage with external complexity: A political action perspective. Organization Studies, 32: 803–824.Google Scholar
Danis, W. M., Chiaburu, D. S., & Lyles, M. A. 2010. The impact of managerial networking intensity and market-based strategies on firm growth during institutional upheaval: A study of small and medium sized enterprises in a transition economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (2): 287–307.Google Scholar
Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. 2011. NERI INDEX of marketization of China's province 2011 report. Beijing: Economic Science Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481–510.Google Scholar
Gu, F. F., Hung, K., & Tse, D. K. 2008. When does guanxi matter? Issues of capitalization and its dark sides. Journal of Marketing, 72 (4): 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, C., & Miller, J. K. 2010. Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China. Management and Organization Review, 6 (2): 267–292.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D. 1998. The declining significance of guanxi in China's economic transition. The China Quarterly, 154 (June): 254–282.Google Scholar
Hamilton, G., & Biggart, N. 1988. Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the Far East. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement): S52–S94.Google Scholar
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. 2008. Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 5 (1): 53–60. Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1): 1–55. Google Scholar
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 268–285. Google Scholar
Kieschnick, R., & McCullough, B. D. 2003. Regression analysis of varieties observed on (0,1): Percentages, proportions and fractions. Statistical Modeling, 3 (3): 193–213.Google Scholar
Kim, H., Kim, H., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2010. Does market-oriented institutional change in an emerging economy make business-group-affiliated multinationals perform better? An institution-based view. Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 1141–1160.Google Scholar
Krippner, G. R., & Alvarez, A. S. 2007. Embeddedness and the intellectual projects of economic sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 219–40.Google Scholar
Lazerson, M. 1995. A new phoenix? Modern putting-out in the Modena knitwear industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (1): 34–59.Google Scholar
Li, H. Y., & Zhang, Y. 2007. The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China's transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (8): 791–804.Google Scholar
Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. 2008. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (4): 383–400.Google Scholar
Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. 2010. Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (4): 349–70.Google Scholar
Lin, N. 2001. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lincoln, J. R., Gerlach, M. L., & Ahmadjian, C. L. 1996. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. American Sociological Review, 61 (1): 67–88.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. D. 2003. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (13): 1315–1327. Google Scholar
Luo, Y. D. 2007. Are joint venture partners more opportunistic in a more volatile environment? Strategic Management Journal, 28 (1): 39–60.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. D., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2012. Guanxi and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8 (1): 139–172.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. D., Liu, Y., & Xue, J. 2009. Relationship investment and channel performance: An analysis of mediating forces. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (7): 1113–1137.Google Scholar
Mullahy, J., & Robert, S. A. 2010. No time to lose: Time constraints and physical activity in the production of health. Review of Economics of the Household, 8 (4): 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics. 2011. Industry classification (GB/T 4754-2011). [Cited 10 July 2014.] Available from URL: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/hyflbz/.Google Scholar
Newman, K. 2000. Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review, 25 (3): 602–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. 2010. The influence of Western banks on corporate governance in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16 (3): 417–436.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W. 2011. Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22 (5): 1286–1296.Google Scholar
Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. 1996. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11: 619–632.Google Scholar
Park, S., & Luo, Y. D. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (5): 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S. H., Li, S., & Tse, D. K. 2006. Market liberalization and firm performance during China's economic transition. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (1): 127–147.Google Scholar
Peng, M. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 275.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21 (2): 492–528.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. D. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal 43 (3): 486–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. 2005. How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22 (4): 321–336.Google Scholar
Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. 2011. The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Shi, W., Sun, S. L, & Peng, M. W. 2012. Sub-national institutional contingencies, network positions, and IJV partner selection. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (7): 1221–1245.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. Y. 2007. Statement by the H.E. ambassador Sun ZhenYu on China's transitional review at the General Council, WTO. [Cited 23 April 2015.] Available from URL: http://sms.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/xxfb/200801/20080105333342.htmlSun.Google Scholar
Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Thun, E. 2010. The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (7): 1161–82.Google Scholar
Tan, J., & Litschert, R. 1994. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: An empirical study of the Chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Tan, J., Yang, J., & Veliyath, R. 2009. Particularistic and system trust among small and medium enterprises: A comparative study in China's transition economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 24 (6): 544–557.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1): 35–67.Google Scholar
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Xin, K., & Pearce, J. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6): 1641–1658.Google Scholar
Xu, D., & Meyer, K. 2013. Linking theory and context: ‘Strategy research in emerging economies’ after Wright et al. (2005). Journal of Management Studies, 50 (7): 1322–1346.Google Scholar
Zaheer, S. A., Albert, S., & Zaheer, A. 1999. Time scales and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4): 725–741.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., & Keh, H. T. 2010. Interorganizational relationships in a transition economy: Organizational forms, governance mechanisms and outcome. Management Organization Review, 6 (1): 123–147.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Li, H. 2010. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (1): 88–109.Google Scholar
Zhou, K. Z., & Poppo, L. 2010. Exchange hazards, relational reliability, and contracts in China: The contingent role of legal enforceability. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (5): 861–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, K. Z., & Xu, D. 2012. How foreign firms curtail local supplier opportunism in China? Detailed contracts, centralized control, and relational governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 43: 677–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, K. Z., Poppo, L., & Yang, Z. 2008. Relational ties or customized contracts? An examination of alternative governance choices in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 526–34.Google Scholar