Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:14:27.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Geographic Search on Product Innovation in Industrial Cluster Firms in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Aiqi Wu  and
Jiang Wei
Aiqi Wu
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University, China
Jiang Wei
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature suggests that cluster firms may undertake both local and nonlocal geographic searches for knowledge that contributes to their product innovation, and that cluster firms must balance their local and nonlocal searches for product innovation. Yet, previous research has seen local and nonlocal searches as one-dimensional, rather than two-dimensional, activities involving search breadth and depth. In this study, we show that local search and nonlocal search are balanced by jointly considering the breadth and depth of geographic search, and that the optimal balance depends on industry dynamism. Using a sample from two industry clusters in China, we find positive relationships between relative local search depth, relative nonlocal search breadth, and the product innovation of cluster firms. Relative local search depth and relative nonlocal search breadth contribute more to product innovation in stable industries than in dynamic industries.

Keywords

Chinacluster firmsgeographic searchproduct innovation中国集群企业地理搜寻产品创新
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 9 , Issue 3: Special Issue Knowledge Search, Spillovers, and Creation in Emerging Markets , November 2013 , pp. 465 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. 1993. Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 18(3): 487–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. 2004. Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9): 887–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahuja, G. & Lampert, C. M. 2001. Entreprcncurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms creates breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7): 521–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H. E. 1979. Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. 1997. The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation. Small Business Economics, 9(1): 21–31.Google Scholar
Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. 2002. Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. 1996. R & D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3): 630–640.Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. 2004. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In Henderson, J. V. & Thisse, J.-F. (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, 4: 2713–2739. Amsterdam: Elsevier Google Scholar
Baptista, R., & Swann, P. 1998. Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5): 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J., & Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31–56.Google Scholar
Beaudry, C., & Breschi, S. 2003. Are firms in clusters really more innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4): 325–342.Google Scholar
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. 2002. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4): 676–709.Google Scholar
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 238–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. 1999. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3): 439–462.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. 2000. Mysteries of the region: Knowledge dynamics in Silicon Valley. In Lee, C., Miller, W. G., Hancock, M. G. & Rowen, H. S. (Eds.), The Silicon Valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneur ship: 16-39. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Camagni, R. 1991. Local milieu, uncertainty and innovation networks: Towards a new dynamic theory of economic space, innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, J. L. C., & Bolon, D. S. 1993. The management of multinational R & D: A neglected topic in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5): 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1): 52–73.Google Scholar
Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effect of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3): 1120–1171.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1): 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, M. S. 2003. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinablc tacitness of being there. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, M. S., & Levitte, Y. M. 2005. Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and Innovation, 12(4): 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. 2008. Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4): 405–422.Google Scholar
Giuliani, E., & Bell, M. 2005. The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34(1): 47–68.Google Scholar
Grabher, G. 2002. The project ecology of advertising: Tasks, talents and teams. Regional Studies, 36(3): 245–262.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 109–122.Google Scholar
Grimpe, C., & Solka, W. 2009. Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low- and high-technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy, 38(3): 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4): 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A. D., Miller, D., & Hanibrick, D. C. 2006. How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5): 447–460.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesei, D. D. 1996. The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1084–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., Sharp, J. A., & Wang, C. 2008. The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, 28(1-2): 63–74.Google Scholar
Katila, R. 2002. New product search overtime: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 995–1010.Google Scholar
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katila, R., & Chen, E. L. 2008. Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(4): 593–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeble, D. 2000. Collective learning processes in European high-technology milieux. In: Keeble, D. & Wilkinson, F. (Eds.), High-technology clusters, networks and collective learning in Europe: 199-299. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. C. 1993. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6): 1633–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagendijk, A., & Oinas, P. 2005. Proximity, external relations, and local economic development. In Lagendijk, A. & Oinas, P. (Eds.), Proximity, distance and diversity, issues on economic interaction and local development: 3-22. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic ManagementJournal, 27(2): 131–150.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D., & March, J. G. 1981. A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(4): 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. Y., & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2002. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6): 469–490.Google Scholar
Li, J., Chen, D., & Shapiro, D. M. 2013. FDI spillovers at national and subnational level: The impact on product innovation by Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 9(3): 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.Google Scholar
Maskell, P. 2001. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 921–943.Google Scholar
McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. 2005. Embedded tics and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11): 1033–1055.Google Scholar
McKelvey, M., Alm, H., & Riccaboni, M. 2003. Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology-pharmaceutical sector? Research Policy, 32(3): 483–501.Google Scholar
Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. 2001. Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the Hollywood studio heads. Strategic Management Journal, 22(8): 725–745.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., Reinmoeller, P., & Senoo, D. 1998. The ‘art’ of knowledge: Systems to capitalize on market knowledge. European Management Journal, 16(6): 673–684.Google Scholar
Oakey, K. 1995. High technology new firms. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
Oinas, P., & Małecki, E. J. 2002. The evolution of technologies in time and space: From national and regional to spatial innovation systems. International Regional Science Review, 25(1): 102–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1): 5–21.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. 2006. Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4): 369–388.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literal and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8(5): 879–903.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2): 73–93.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1998. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 2000. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1): 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratti, R., Bramanti, A., & Gordon, R. 1997. The dynamics of innovative regions: The GREMI approach. Aldershot, Brookfield: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4): 287–306.Google Scholar
Saxenian, A. L. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press.Google Scholar
Scott, A. J. 1998. Regions and the world economy: The coming shape of global production, competition, and political order. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, C., & Brown, J. S. 1999. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4): 381–400.Google Scholar
Shaver, J. M., & Flyer, F. 2000. Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12): 1175–1193.Google Scholar
Sidhu, J. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Volberda, H. W. 2007. The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18(1): 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmie, J. 2003. Innovation and urban regions and national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge. Regional Studies, 37(6): 607–620.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sorensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. 2000. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1): 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez-Villa, L., & Walrod, W. 1997. Operational strategy, R & D and intra-metropolitan clustering in a polycentric structure: The advanced electronics industries of the Los Angeles basin. Urban Studies, 34(9): 1343–1380.Google Scholar
Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. 2004. Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29(2): 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. 2009. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S & P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2): 221–231.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. 1994. Sticky information' and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4): 429–439.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1991. The nontraditional quality of organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 116–124.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D. 1998. Board games: How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3): 511–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weterings, A., & Boschma, R. A. 2009. Does spatial proximity to customers matter for innovative performance? Evidence from the Dutch software sector. Research Policy, 38(5): 746–755.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Li, H. Y. 2010. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1): 88–109.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Li, H. Y., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 2009. Intercommunity relationships and community growth in China's high-technology industries 1988-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 30(7): 163–183.Google Scholar