Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T23:45:27.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Value Congruence Lead to Voice? Cooperative Voice and Cooperative Silence under Team and Differentiated Transformational Leadership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

An-Chih Wang ,
Hsu-Hung Hsieh ,
Chou-Yu Tsai  and
Bor-Shiuan Cheng
An-Chih Wang
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Hsu-Hung Hsieh
Affiliation:
United Microelectronics Corporation, Taiwan
Chou-Yu Tsai
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Binghamion, USA
Bor-Shiuan Cheng
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study seeks to resolve a puzzle of the coexistence of follower cooperative voice and cooperative silence (expressing/withholding work-related ideas, information, and opinions based on collective, cooperative motives) in the presence of transformational leadership. A sample of 193 bank employees under 52 managers revealed that in the presence of group-focused transformational leadership, both voice and silence based on cooperative motives increased through the mediation of value congruence between leaders and followers. However, cooperative voice was more likely to be the main response to a high level of value congruence when followers under the same leader perceived individual-focused transformational leadership uniformly. Under a high level of differentiated individual-focused transformational leadership, value congruence was likely to result in more cooperative silence. We discuss implications for future research on both leadership and employee voice.

Keywords

differentiated leadershipsilencetransformational leadershipvalue congurencevoice差序领导沉默转型领导价值观契合建言
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 341 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Antonakis, J. & House, R.J. 2002. The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In Avolio, B.J. & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership; The road-ahead: 3–33. Amsterdam: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Ashforth, S.J. Rothbard, N.P Piderit, S. K. & Dutton, J. E. 1998. Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equality issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1); 23–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashkanasy, N. M. & O'Connor, C. 1997. Value congruence in Leader-member exchange. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(5): 647–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avolio, B.J., & Bass, B.M. 1988. Transformational leadership, charisma, and beyond. In Hunt, J. G., Balaga, B. R., Bachler, H. P. & Schriesheim, C. (Eds.), Emerging leadership vista: 29–50. Emsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. 1995. Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the difliision of transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2): 199–218.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. & Avoho, B. J. 1995. MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. & Steidlmeier, P. 1999. Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2): 181–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. K. & Kozlowski, S. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: 349–381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bono, J. E. & Judge, T. A. 2003. Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5): 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E. & Treviño, L. K. 2006. Socialized charismatic leadership, value congruence, and deviance in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4): 954–962.Google Scholar
Brown, M. E. & Treviño, L. K. 2009. Leader-follower value congruence: Are socialized charismatic leaders better able to achieve it? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2): 478–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chai, S. K. & Rhee, M. 2010. Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(1): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. P., Xie, X. & Chang, S. 2011. Cooperative and competitive orientation among Chinese people: Scale development and validation. Management and Organization Review 7(2) 353–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B. S. Chou, L.R Wu, T. Y. Huang, M. P., & Farh, J.L. 2004. Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1): –117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detert, J. R. & Burris, E. R. 2007. Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4): 869–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvir, T. Eden, D. Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. 2002. Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4): 735–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C. 2003. Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action learns. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6): 1419–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D. & Liang, J. 2007. Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3): 715–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, X., Hamilton, G. G. & Wang, Z. 1992. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society, a translation of Fei Xiaotong's Xiangtu Zhongguo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ford, C. M. 1996. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1112–1142.Google Scholar
Fu, P. P., Tsui, A. S. Liu, J., & Li, L. 2010. Pursuit of whose happiness? Executive leaders' transformational behaviors and personal values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2) 222–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D. J. 2009. LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 20(4): 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ilies, R. Nahrgang, J. D. & Morgeson, F. P. 2007. Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1): 269–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janis, I. L. 1982. Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jung, D. I., & Avolio, B. J. 2000. Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating e flee Is of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8): 949–964.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kark, R., & Shamir, B. 2002. The dual effect of transformational leadership: Priming relational and collective selves and further effects on followers. In Avolio, B.J. & Yammarino, F.J. (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead: 67–91. Amsterdam: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C. 1958. Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1): 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L. Chen, G. Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X. & Lowe, K. B. 2009. Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 744–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L. Lowe, K. B. & Gibson, C. B. 2006. A quarter century of culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 285–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2000. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multi-level research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3): 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouzes, J. M. & Posner, B. Z. 1995. The leadership challenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. 1998. Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6): 853–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. H. 2009. Top 30 CEOs who have made a fortune for stakeholders for ten straight years. Money, 22(7): 122–163.(in Chinese).Google Scholar
Little, T. D. Cunningham, W. A. Shahar, G. & Widaman, K. F. 2002. To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2):151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. 1965. The definition and measurement of job involvemcnt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1): 24–33.Google Scholar
Maslach, C. & Jackson, S. E. 1981. The Maslach burnout inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E. & Taylor, S. R. 2007. A framework for testing meso-mediating relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2): 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliken, F. J. Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. 2003. An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6): 1453–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, E. W.; & Milliken, F. J. 2000. Organizational silence: A barrier to change anddevelopment in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4): 706–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, W. W. 1990. A review of research on groupthink. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3(4): 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinder, C. C. & Harlos, K. P. 2001. Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In Rowland, K. M. & Ferris, G. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management 20: 331–369. NewYork: JAI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M. MacKenzie, S. B. Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3): 879–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shamir, B. House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. 1993. The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4): 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, B., Zakay, E. Breinin, E. & Popper, M. 1998. Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates' attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors' appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 387–409.Google Scholar
Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Leinhardt, S. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology: 290–312. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Stamper, C. L. & Van Dyne, L. 2001. Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: A field study of restaurant employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(5): 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staw, B. M. & Boettger, R. D. 1990. Task revision: A neglect form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3): 534–559.Google Scholar
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. 1996. Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8): 776–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyne, L. Ang, S. & Botero, I. C. 2003. Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6): 1359–1392.Google Scholar
Wang, A. C. & Cheng, B. S. 2010. When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1): 106–121.Google Scholar
Wang, H. Law, K. S. Hackett, R. Wang, D. X. & Chen, Z. X. 2005. Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1) 29–56.Google Scholar
Wu, J. B. Tsui, A. S. & Kinicki, A. J. 2010. Consequences of difTerentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1): 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yammarino, J.F., & Bass, M. B. 1990. Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human Relations, 43(10): 975–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C.F. & Chiu, C. Y. 1987. The dilemma facing Chinese subjects in answering questionnaires: Reflecting on the over-reliance on Western rating scales in research. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 29(1): 59–78 (Chinese).Google Scholar
Yukl, G. 2002. Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar