Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:07:51.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Miriam Erez  and
Rikki Nouri
Miriam Erez
Affiliation:
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Rikki Nouri
Affiliation:
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present article aims to answer the question of whether creativity is universal or culture-specific. We develop a conceptual framework that expands the existing knowledge in two ways. First, it distinguishes between the two dimensions of creativity – novelty and usefulness, and their relationship to culture. Second, it clarifies how the social context moderates the relationship between culture and creativity. We focus on the social context where cultural differences are likely to be more salient because of the presence of others, relative to the private work context where no one observes whether a person performs in a normative or a unique way. In addition, we propose that task structure, whether a task is tightly or loosely structured, is an important contextual characteristic that moderates the relationship between culture and creativity. Lastly, we offer several propositions to guide future research.

Keywords

creativityculturenoveltysocial contexttask contextusefulness创造カ文化新颖性社会情境任务情境有用性
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 351 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2010

References

Aaker, J., & Schmitt, B. 2001. Culture-dependent assimilation and differentiation of the self: Preferences for consumption symbols in the United States and China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5): 561–576.Google Scholar
Allik, J., & McCrae, R. R. 2004. Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 35(1): 13–28.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. 1982. The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5): 997–1013.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. 1983. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2): 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in context. New York: Westview.Google Scholar
Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Salomon, K. 1999. Social ‘facilitation’ as challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1): 68–77.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y. 2007. Where (Who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1): 133–151.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. 1996. Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1): 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocklehurst, M. 2005. Innovation indicators in the financial times. Thompson Scientific, Nov [Last accessed 4 March 2010.] Available from URL: http://science.thomsonreuters.com/news/2005-11/8298269/Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. 1981. The self attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(6): 545–568.Google Scholar
Cohen, D., & Gunz, A. 2002. As seen by the other …: Perspectives on the self in the memories and emotional perceptions of Easterners and Westerners. Psychological Science, 13(1): 55–59.Google Scholar
Cummings, L. 1965. Organizational climate for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 8(3): 220–227.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Burke, P. A., & Gump, N. W. 2007. Creativity and value. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2): 91–103.Google Scholar
Drolet, A. 2002. Inherent rule variability in consumer choice: Changing rules for change's sake. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3): 293–305.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Haskins, F., & Gamblton, P. 1999. Promised reward and creativity: Effects of prior experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(3): 308–325.Google Scholar
Erez, M. 2008. Social-cultural influences on work motivation. In Kanfer, R.Chen, G. & Pritchard, R. D. (Eds.), Work motivation: Past, present, and future: 501–538. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Erez, M. 2010. Culture and job design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2): 389–400.Google Scholar
Erez, M., & Earley, P. C. 1993. The relationship among needs, values and culture. In Erez, M. (Ed.), Culture, self-identity, and work: 97–103. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eylon, D., & Au, K. Y. 1999. Exploring empowerment cross-cultural differences among the power distance dimension. InternationalJournal of Intercultural Relations, 23(3): 373–385.Google Scholar
Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. 1996. Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatignon, H., Tushman, M. L., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. 2002. A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type and characteristics. Management Science, 48(9): 1103–1122.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. 2007. Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 479–514.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., & Raver, J. L. 2006. On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (6): 1225–1244.Google Scholar
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. 2001. When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 513–524.Google Scholar
Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. 2006. Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1): 96–109.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. 1967. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K., & Wang, H. 2009. Getting China & India right: Strategies for leveraging the world's fastest-growing economies for global advantage. San Francisco, CA: Josscy-Bass.Google Scholar
Harzing, A. W., & Hofstedc, G. 1996. Planned change in organizations: The influence of national culture. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 14, 297–340.Google Scholar
He, Y., & Tian, Z. 2008. Government-oriented corporate public relation strategies in transitional China. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 367–391.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., & Buchtel, E. E. 2009. Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 369–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heine, S. J., Takemoto, T., Moskalenko, S., Lasaleta, J., & Henrich, J. 2008. Mirrors in the head: Cultural variation in objective self-awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7): 879–887.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
House, R.J., Hanges, P. J., & Javidan, M. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Huang, X., Van de Vilert, E., & Van der Vegt, G. 2005. Breaking the silence culture: Stimulation of participation and employee opinion withholding cross-nationally. Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 459–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ip, G.W.-M., Chen, J., & Chiu, C.-Y.. 2006. The relationship of promotion focus, need for cognitive closure, and categorical accessibility in American and Hong Kong Chinese university students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 201–205.Google Scholar
Israel Venture Capital Research Center. 2010. IVC High-Tech Industry Reports. [Last accessed 16 May 2010.] Available from URL: http://www.ivc-online.com/prodReports.aspGoogle Scholar
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. 2006. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11): 1661–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javidan, M., & House, R.J. 2001. Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. K., & Davis, J. 2000. National culture and innovation: Implications for locating global R&D operations. Management International Review, 40, 1–39.Google Scholar
Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Kncham, F. D. 2004. Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3): 291–305.Google Scholar
Kasof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A., & Grecnberger, E. 2007. Values and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2): 105–122.Google Scholar
Kim, H. S., & Drolet, A. 2003. Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2): 373–382.Google Scholar
Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. 1999. Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4): 785–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K., & Morris, M. W. 2010. Culture and creativity: A social psychological analysis. In Cremer, D. D., Murnighan, J. K. & Dick, R. Van (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations: 371–395. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Liu, L. A., Friedman, R. A., & Chi, S. 2005. ‘Ren Qing’ versus the ‘Big Five’: The role of culturally sensitive measures of individual difference in distributive negotiations. Management and Organization Review, 1(2): 225–247.Google Scholar
Lynn, M., & Harris, J. 1997. Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(21): 1861–1883.Google Scholar
Maddi, S. R., Propst, S. B., & Feldinger, I. 1965. Three expressions of the need for variety. Journal of Personality, 33(1): 82–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madjar, N., & Oldham, G. R. 2006. Task rotation and polychronicity: Effects on individuals' creativity. Human Performance, 19(2): 117–131.Google Scholar
Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. 2004. Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior – Special Issue on Innovation, 25(2): 175–199.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. 1977. The interaction of person and situation. In Magnusson, D. & Endler, N. S. (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology: 333–352. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mok, A., & Morris, M. W. 2010. Asian-Americans' Creative Styles in Asian and American Situations: Assimilative and Contrastive Responses as a Function of Bicultural Identity Integration. Management and Organization Review, 6(3): 371–390.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. 1994. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6): 949–971.Google Scholar
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F.J. 2003. Guest editor's introduction: Speaking up, remaining silent: The dynamics of voice and silence in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6): 1353–1357.Google Scholar
Nouri, R., Erez, M., Rockstuhl, T., & Ang, S. 2008. Creativity in multicultural teams: The effects of cultural diversity and situational strength on creative performance. The Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 8-13, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. 1991. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 487–516.Google Scholar
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. 1996. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3): 607–634.Google Scholar
Paletz, S., & Peng, K. 2008. Problem finding and contradiction: Examining the relationship between naive dialectical thinking, ethnicity, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2): 139–151.Google Scholar
Pelto, P. 1968. The difference between ‘tight’ and ‘loose’ societies. Transaction, 5(1): 37–40.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. 1973. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, G. S. 1981. Driven by distraction: An integrative review of social facilitation theory and research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(3): 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25):(Ed.): 1–26. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. 1990. Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5): 878–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, D., & Singer, S. 2009. Start up nation: The story of Israel economic miracle. New York, NY: Twelve Hachette Book Group.Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E. 1991. Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2): 179–185.Google Scholar
Simpson, L. 2001. Fostering creativity. Training, 38(12): 64–71.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. 1977. Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5): 518–527.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. 1974. The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Technical-norms manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. 1989. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3): 506–520.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wcsley.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. F., & Miller, F. G. 1971. The drive theory of social facilitation. Psychological Review, 78(1): 44–57.Google Scholar
Westwood, R., & Low, D. R. 2003. The multicultural muse: Culture, creativity and innovation. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(2): 235–259.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. 1965. Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681): 269–274.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. 2003. Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In Mortocchio, J. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management: 165–217. Oxford, England: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., & Su, Y. 2010. A missing piece of the puzzle: The organizational context in cultural patterns of creativity. Management and Organization Review, 6(3): 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, X., Tarn, K.-P., Morris, M. W., Lee, S.-L., Lau, I. Y.-M., & Chiu, C.-Y.. 2009. Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms ofcultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4): 579–597.Google Scholar