Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:33:59.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Building Sustainable Organizations in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

Chris Marquis
Affiliation:
Cornell University, USA
Susan E. Jackson
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, USA
Yuan Li
Affiliation:
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Abstract

As China shifts its development model from focusing on economic growth at all costs to a model in which economic growth is balanced with solving pressing societal and environmental problems, there is an increasing need for management research on building sustainable organizations in China. This collection of papers focuses attention on the role of business in promoting sustainable economic development, highlighting a number of key processes including: the factors that foster transparency and CSR reporting, how stakeholders can influence corporations to abandon their CSR commitments, the benefits of environmental branding and labeling, and the antecedents and performance consequences of proactive environmental strategies. In this introductory essay we reflect on recent trends in sustainability research in China, and to encourage this important movement, provide recommendations for future research directions.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22 (4): 4562.Google Scholar
Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. 2012. The strategic importance of environmental sustainability. In Jackson, S. E., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (Eds.), Managing human resources for environmental sustainability: 2135. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.Google Scholar
Bansal, P., & Corley, K. 2012. From the Editors: Publishing in AMJ-Part 7: What's different about qualitative research? Academy of Management Journal, 55 (3): 509513.Google Scholar
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 717736.Google Scholar
Barley, S. R. 2006. When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, T. E. 2005. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8: 274289.Google Scholar
Davis, M. S. 1971. That's interesting: Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1 (4): 309344.Google Scholar
Edelman. 2010. Citizens engage! 2010 good purpose survey. [Cited 15 July 2015]. Available from URL: www.edelman.com/insights/special/GoodPurpose-2010globalPPT_WEBversion.pdf Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 2011. Is China a responsible stakeholder? International Affairs, 87 (3): 539553.Google Scholar
Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. 2010. The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21 (5): 10921107.Google Scholar
Flammer, C. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56 (3): 758781.Google Scholar
Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. 2000. The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65: 96116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, D. 2012. China and globalization: The social, economic and political transformation of Chinese society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. 2007. Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 13851399.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. 2001. Linking organizational and field-level analyses the diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization & Environment, 14 (2): 133156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J., Buckle, S., Hoskins, B., George, G. 2014. From the editors: Climate change and management, Academy of Management Journal, 57, 615623.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. E. 2012. Building empirical foundations to inform the future practice of environmental sustainability. In Jackson, S. E., Ones, D., & Dilchert, S. (Eds.), Managing human resources for environmental sustainability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. 2001. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 698716.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Guo, J., & Chi, N. 2015. The antecedents and performance consequences of proactive environmental strategy: A meta-analytic review of national contingency. Management and Organization Review, 11 (3): 521557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Feng, T., & Li, S. 2015. Stakeholder influences and organization responses: A case study of corporate social responsibility suspension. Management and Organization Review¸ 11 (3): 469491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. 2015. Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9 (1): 291335.Google Scholar
Marquis, C., & Qian, C. 2014. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25: 127148.Google Scholar
Marquis, C., Toffel, M. W., & Zhou, Y. 2015. When do firms greenwash? Corporate visibility, civil society scrutiny, and environmental disclosure. Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit Working Paper, (11–115).Google Scholar
Marquis, C., Zhang, J., & Zhou, Y. 2011. Regulatory uncertainty and corporate responses to environmental protection in China. California Management Review, 54: 3963.Google Scholar
Marquis, C., Zhang, H., & Zhou, L. 2013. China's quest to adopt electric vehicles. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 11 (2): 5257.Google Scholar
Nielson. 2014. Global consumers are willing to put their money where their heart is when it comes to companies committed to social responsibility. [Cited 15 July 2015.] Available at URL: www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2014/global-consumers-are-willing-to-put-their-money-where-their-heart-is.html Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 25: 879903.Google Scholar
Rouse, M. J., & Daellenbach, U. S. 1999. Research notes and communications: rethinking research methods for the resource-based perspective: isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 487494.Google Scholar
Salzman, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., Steger, U. 2005. The business case for corporate Sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23 (1): 2736.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. 2011. Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2): 247271.Google Scholar
Sima, Y. 2011. Grassroots environmental activism and the internet: Constructing a green public sphere in China. Asian Studies Review, 35 (4), 477497.Google Scholar
Sonenshein, S., DeCelles, K. A., & Dutton, J. E. 2014. It's not easy being green: The role of self-evaluations in explaining support of environmental issues. Academy of Management Journal, 57 (1): 737.Google Scholar
Sun, J., Wang, F., Wang, F., & Yin, H. 2015. Community institutions and initial diffusion of corporate social responsibility practices in China's banking industry. Management and Organization Review, 11 (3): 441–468.Google Scholar
Tilcsik, A., & Marquis, C. 2013. Punctuated generosity: How mega-events and natural disasters affect corporate philanthropy in U.S. communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 111148.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2013. Editorial: The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 9 (3): 375394.Google Scholar
Wang, H., & Qian, C. 2011. Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54 (6): 11591181.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Cui, Z., & Liang, X. 2015. Does it pay to be green? Financial benefits of environmental labeling among Chinese firms, 2000–2005. Management and Organization Review, 11 (3): 493519.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Marquis supplementary material

Translated abstracts

Download Marquis supplementary material(File)
File 24.1 KB