Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T22:46:50.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Outcome of Decoupling and De-globalization? The Weakened Impact of Internationalization on Innovation of Chinese Firms Since 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2021

Liang Wang Open the ORCID record for Liang Wang [Opens in a new window]  and
Zaiyang Xie
Liang Wang
Affiliation:
University of San Francisco, USA
Zaiyang Xie*
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University of Technology, China
*
Corresponding author: Zaiyang Xie ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Dialogue, Debate, and Discussion
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 630 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Accepted by Deputy Editor Peter Ping Li

References

REFERENCES

Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. 2001. From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Boston: HBS Press.10.1145/503351.503119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenett, S. 2019. Protectionism, state discrimination, and international business since the onset of the global financial crisis. Journal of International Business Policy, 2(1): 9–36.10.1057/s42214-019-00021-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farndale, E., Thite, M., Budhwar, P., & Kwon, B. 2020. De-globalization and talent sourcing: Cross-national evidence from high-tech firms. Human Resource Management, 60(2): 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosain, S. 2019. Huawei ban in the US: Projected consequences for international trade. International Journal of Commerce and Economics, 1(2): 22–25.Google Scholar
Hsu, C. W., Lien, Y. C., & Chen, H. 2015. R&D internationalization and innovation performance. International Business Review, 24(2): 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y., Tian, K., Wu, T., & Yang, C. 2021. The lose-lose consequence: Assessing US-China trade decoupling through the lens of global value chains. Management and Organization Review, 17(2): 429–446.10.1017/mor.2021.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, H. 2018. De-globalization: The rise of disembedded unilateralism. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 10(1): 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K., & Gramer, R. 2020. The great decoupling. Foreign Policy. Available from URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/05/14/china-us-pandemic-economy-tensions-trump-coronavirus-covid-new-cold-war-economics-the-great-decoupling/Google Scholar
Khan, Z., Rao-Nicholson, R., & Tarba, S. Y. 2016. Global networks as a mode of balance for exploratory innovations in a late liberalizing economy. Journal of World Business, 53(3): 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobrin, S. J. 2017. Bricks and mortar in a borderless world: Globalization, the backlash, and the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy Journal, 7(2): 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P., Lewin, A. Y., Witt, M. A. & Välikangas, L. 2021. De-globalization and decoupling: A luck of the draw for India? Management and Organization Review, 17(2): 389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P., Prashantham, S., Zhou, A. J., & Zhou, S. S. 2021. Compositional springboarding and EMNE evolution. Journal of International Business Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00391-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2018. A general theory of springboard MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2): 129–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., & Witt, M. A. 2021. Springboard MNEs under de-globalization. Journal of International Business Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00423-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, P. 2021. De-Globalisation and decoupling: Post-COVID-19 myths versus realities. Management and Organization Review, 17(1): 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A. 2019a. De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7): 1053–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A. 2019b. China's challenge: Geopolitics, de-globalization, and the future of Chinese business. Management and Organization Review, 15(4): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A., Li, P. P., Välikangas, L., & Lewin, A. Y. 2021. De-globalization and decoupling: Game changing consequences? Management and Organization Review, 17(1): 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Z., & Li, J. 2018. Exporting and innovating among emerging market firms: The moderating role of institutional development. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2): 222–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar