Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:02:12.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards an Interdisciplinary Conceptualization of Trust: A Typological Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Peter Ping Li
Peter Ping Li*
Affiliation:
California State University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adopting a diversity-in-unity perspective that identifies all shared dimensions and typical delineations, both as structure-similar yet content-diverse configurations, this paper proposes an interdisciplinary conceptualization of trust with primary trust ideal-types. This conceptualization contains three components: (i) a typology of four trust dimensions related to trust conditions and trust functions; (ii) a typology of four trust delineations derived from the four trust dimensions; and (iii) a typology of four trust ideal-types built upon the first two typologies. These typologies jointly serve as a salient platform to unify the fragmented trust literature.

Keywords

diversity-in-unitydualitytrust-as-attitudetrust-as-choicetypology of trust多元统一矛盾体态度信任行为信任分类法。
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , November 2007 , pp. 421 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P. S. 2001. Market, hierarchy and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12: 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. W. 1964. Introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Bacharach, S. B. 1989. Organization theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14: 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. 1983. The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. 1994. Trustworthiness: Can it be a source of competitive advantage? Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Special Winter Issue): 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigley, G., & Pearce, J. 1998. Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, W. M., & Brass, D. J. 2006. Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 70–82.Google Scholar
Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. 1989. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. In Scott, W. R. & Blake, J. (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology, 15: 97–118. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Review.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. 1995. Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 1: 255–292.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, A., Sopher, B., & Strand, P. 2002. Cooperation in social dilemmas, trust, and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23: 231–250.Google Scholar
Child, J. 2001. Trust – The fundamental bond in global collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 29: 274–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J., & Moellering, G. 2003. Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business environment. Organization Science, 14: 69–80.Google Scholar
Chiles, T. H., & McMackin, J. F. 1996. Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review, 21: 73–99.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. 1978. Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43: 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. 1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23: 491–512.Google Scholar
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. 2001. Trust, control and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22: 251–84.Google Scholar
Dietz, G., & den Hartog, D. 2006. Measuring trust inside organizations. Personnel Review, 35: 557–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. 2001. The role of trust in organizational setting. Organization Science, 12: 450–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. 2002. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 611–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doty, D. H., & Click, W. H. 1994. Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19: 230–251.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. 2003. The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and increasing information sharing: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14: 57–68.Google Scholar
Fei, X. 1992 [1947]. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ferrin, D. L., Dirks, K. T., & Shah, P. P. 2006. Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 870–883.Google Scholar
Flynn, F. J. 2005. Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30: 737–750.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fung, Y. 1970. The spirit of Chinese philosophy. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. 1988. Can we trust trust? In Gambetta, D. (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations: 213–37. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gibbons, D. E. 2004. Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 238–262.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, N. 2003. Measuring trust in working relationships: The behavioral trust inventory. Working Paper, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. 2004. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A metaanalysis of effects and processes. Working Paper. New York University.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. 2002. Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 23: 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, L. 1995. Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkpen, A. C., & Currall, S. C. 2004. The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science, 15: 586–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insko, C. A., Kirchner, J. L., Pinter, B., Efaw, J., & Wildschut, T. 2005. Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a function of as a trust and categorization: The paradox of expected cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 365–385.Google Scholar
Jeffries, F. L., & Reed, R. 2000. Trust and adaptation in relational contracting. Academy of Management Review, 25: 873–882.Google Scholar
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. 1998. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23: 531–546.Google Scholar
Kahnemann, D., & Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263–291.Google Scholar
Koeszegi, S. T. 2004. Trust-building strategies in inter-organizational negotiations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19: 640–660.Google Scholar
Kollock, P. 1994. The emergence of exchange structure: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. American Journal of Sociology, 100: 313–345.Google Scholar
Koza, M. P., & Lewin, A. Y. 1998. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9: 255–264.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review Psychology, 50: 569–598.Google Scholar
Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. 2006. When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49: 894–917.Google Scholar
Larson, A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 76–104.Google Scholar
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. 2000. Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3: 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50: 1477–1490.Google Scholar
Levin, D. Z., Whitener, E. M., & Cross, R. 2006. Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating impact of relationship length. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91:1163–1171.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. 2006. Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32: 991–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D., & Weigert, A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63: 967–985.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 1998. Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19: 829–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2005. The puzzle of China's township-village enterprises: The paradox of local corporatism in a dual-track economic transition. Management and Organizational Review, 1: 197–224.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2007. Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: An integrated framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 227–246.Google Scholar
Li, P. P., Yao, X., & Xi, Y. 2006. To unpack the black-box of micro-macro link: The initiating and integrating mechanisms. Paper presented at the 2006 Academy of International Business Annual Conference, Beijing, China, June 23-26.Google Scholar
Long, C. P., & Sitkin, S. B. 2006. Trust in balance: How managers integrate trust-building and task control. In Bachman, R., Zaheer, A. (Eds.), Handbook of trust research: 87–106. Chelterham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Luo, J. 2005. Particularistic trust and general trust: Network analysis in Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 1: 437–458.Google Scholar
Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. 2002. The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, K. J., & Argyres, N. S. 2004. Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organization Science, 15: 394–410.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. 1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. 2005. Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48: 874–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20: 709–734.Google Scholar
McAllister, D.J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24–59.Google Scholar
McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14: 91–103.Google Scholar
McKelvey, B. 1982. Organizational systematics: Taxonomy, evolution, classification. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. J. 2002. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce customer: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13: 334–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415–444.Google Scholar
Moellering, G. 2005. The trust/control duality. International Sociology, 20: 283–305.Google Scholar
Moellering, G. 2006. Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Molm, L., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. 2000. Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105: 1396–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relational marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58: 20–38.Google Scholar
Ng, K., & Chua, R. Y. J. 2006. Do I contribute more when I trust more? Different effects of cognitiveand affective-based trust. Management and Organizational Review, 2: 43–66.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. V., Weinstein, M., & Meyer, A. D. 2005. Development of trust: A study of interfirm relationships in Vietnam. Asian Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 211–235.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B. 2002. Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 129–141.Google Scholar
Pearce, J. L. 2001. Organization and management in the embrace of government. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23: 707–725.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 12, 295–236. Greenwich, Conn: JAI.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, P. 1992. The organizational taxonomy: Definition and design. Academy of Management Review, 17: 758–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 393–404.Google Scholar
Saparito, P. A., Chen, C. C., & Sapienza, H. J. 2004. The role of relational trust in bank-small firm relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 400–410.Google Scholar
Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. 2007. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present and future. Academy of Management Review, 32: 344–354.Google Scholar
Seligman, A. B. 1997. The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Seo, M., Barrett, L. F., & Bartunek, J. M. 2004. The role of affective experience in work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29: 423–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Settoon, R. P., & Mossholder, K. W. 2002. Relational quality and relationship context as antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 255–267.Google Scholar
Shamir, B., & Lapidot, Y. 2003. Trust in organizational superiors: Systemic and collective considerations. Organization Studies, 24: 463–491.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. P. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93: 623–658.Google Scholar
Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. 1992. Reconceptualizating the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review:, 17: 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. 1995. Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and risk propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1573–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, K. J. 2003. Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organization Science, 14: 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydow, J. 1998. Understanding the constitution of interorganizational trust. In Lane, C. & Bachmann, R. (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications: 31–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative. Science Quarterly, 42: 35–67.Google Scholar
Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Waley, A. 1989. The Analects of Confucius. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 2007. Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32: 595–621.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1993. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 34: 453–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolthuis, R. K., Hillebrand, B., & Nooteboom, B. 2005. Trust, contract and relationship development. Organization Studies, 26: 813–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. 1994. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18: 129–166.Google Scholar
Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. 2005. Cross-cultural differences in relationship- and group-based trust. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31: 48–62.Google Scholar
Zaheer, A., & Harris, J. 2006. Interorganizational trust. In Shenkar, O. & Reurer, J. J. (Eds.), Handbook of strategic alliances: 169–97. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaheer, A., Venkatraman, , & N. 1995. Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zand, D. E. 1972. Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 229–39.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Zhao, W., Li, Q., & Cai, H. 2003. Embeddedness and contractual relationships in China's transitional economy. American Sociological Review, 68: 75–102.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 8, 53–111. Greenwich, Conn: JAI.Google Scholar