Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:32:02.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Social Dilemma Perspective on Psychological Contract Fulfilment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Chih-Ting Shih
Affiliation:
National Pingtung Institute of Commerce, Taiwan
Shyh-Jer Chen
Affiliation:
National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan

Abstract

Recent research suggests that employees perceive organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) as costly while OCB in the aggregate benefits organizations. Employees thus face an OCB dilemma. This study adopts the social dilemma perspective, proposing that employee OCB varies with the three types of psychological contracts (e.g., relational, balanced, and transactional) due to different degrees of perceived social dilemma and explains why employees engage in OCB in the context of varying levels of social dilemmas. We used moderated structural equation modelling to test the mediating and moderating hypotheses using data from 485 supervisor-subordinate dyads from 58 companies in a variety of industries in Taiwan. As predicted, results suggest that employee OCB has the strongest relationship with balanced psychological contract. Results also confirm the mediating role of felt obligations in both relational and balanced psychological contracts and the moderating role of empathie concerns in transactional psychological contract. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these results.

Type
Regular Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. 1998. The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology; 83(2): 247260.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411423.Google Scholar
Armstrong, S. J., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3): 396402.Google Scholar
Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., Bendoly, E., & Richey, R. G. 2006. Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: Exploring the impact of task interdependence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1): 193201.Google Scholar
Baron, J. 1997. The illusion of morality as self-interest: A reason to cooperate in social dilemmas. Psychological Science, 8(4): 330335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. 1983. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee ‘citizenship’. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4): 587595.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., & Moran, T. 1999. Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner's dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(7): 909924.Google Scholar
Bergeron, D. M. 2007. The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 10781095.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 349381. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Botino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B., & Turnley, W. H. 2006. The impact of impression-management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3): 281297.Google Scholar
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. 2005. The personal costs of citizenship behavior: The relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4): 740748.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3): 185216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. 1992. Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2): 233255.Google Scholar
Cortina, J. M., Chen, G., & Dunlap, W. P. 2001. Testing interaction effects in LISREL: Examination and illustration of available procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 4(4): 324360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle-Shapiro, J. 2002. A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8): 927946.Google Scholar
Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. 2000. Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: A large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7): 903930.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. 1980. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(4): 85.Google Scholar
De Jong, J., Schalk, R., & De Cuyper, N. 2009. Balanced versus unbalanced psychological contracts in temporary and permanent employment: Associations with employee attitudes. Management & Organization Review, 5(3): 329351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. 2001. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 4251.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and extra-role behavior in Chinese society. Administration Science Quarterly, 42(3): 421444.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. 2004. Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2): 241253.Google Scholar
Glick, W. H. 1985. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3): 601616.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2): 161178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, C. L., & Levy, P. E. 2001. The importance of instrumentality beliefs in the prediction of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(1): 6475.Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bender, P. M. 1998. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4): 424453.Google Scholar
Hui, C., Lam, S. K., & Law, K. S. 2000. Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5): 822828.Google Scholar
Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. 2004. Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: Investigating generalizability and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2): 311321.Google Scholar
Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. 1995. Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effect between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2): 348357.Google Scholar
James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2): 219229.Google Scholar
Joireman, J., Kamdar, D., Daniels, D., & Duell, B. 2006. Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6): 13071320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. 1996. Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In Marcoulides, G. A. & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques: 5788. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. 1986. Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3): 422431.Google Scholar
Kickul, J., & Lester, S. W. 2001. Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2): 191217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komorita, S. S., Parks, C. D., & Hulbert, L. G. 1992. Reciprocity and the induction of cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4): 607617.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, M. A., Meglino, B. M., & Lester, S. W. 1996. The effect of other-oriented values on decision making: A test of propositions of a theory of concern for others in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3): 234245.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Allen, N.J. 2002. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 131142.Google Scholar
LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. 2002. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 5265.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Rousseau, D., & Silla-Guerola, I. 2008. Meta-analysis of the content of the psychological contract and its effects. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Lo, S., & Aryee, S. 2003. Psychological contract breach in a Chinese context: An integrative approach. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4): 10051020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNccly, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. 1994. The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2): 836844.Google Scholar
Mannix, E. A., Tinsley, C. H., & Bazerman, M. 1995. Negotiating over time: Impediments to integrative solutions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3): 241251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. 1983. Solving social dilemmas: A review. In Wheeler, L. & Shaver, P. (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: 1144. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Murnighan, J. K., & Roth, A. 1983. Expecting continued play in prisoner's dilemma games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27(2): 279300.Google Scholar
Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M. 1981. Social dilemmas. In Stephenson, G. & Dvais, J. H. (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology: 1: 3766. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington books.Google Scholar
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. 1995. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4): 775802.Google Scholar
Pilluda, M., & Chen, X. P. 1999. Social norms and cooperation in social dilemmas: The effects of context and feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(2): 81103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ping, R. A. 1995. A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3). 336347.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3): 513563.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratner, R. K, & Miller, D. T. 2001. The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1): 516.Google Scholar
Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. 2001. The cause of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6): 13061314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, S. L. 1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(9): 574599.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. 1995. Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3): 289298.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. 1994. Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3): 245259.Google Scholar
Rogelberg, S. G., Conway, J. M., Sederburg, M. E., Spitzmuller, C., Aziz, S., & Knight, W. E. 2003. Profiling active and passive nonrespondents to an organizational survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6): 11041114.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. 1990. New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5): 389400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. 2000. Psychological contract inventory: Technical report (Tech. Rep. No. 2). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Taylor, M. S., Coyle Shapiro, J. A. M., Liden, R. C., Parks, J. M., Morrison, E. W., Porter, L. W., Robinson, S. L., Roehling, M. V., Rousseau, D. M., Schalk, R., Tsui, A. S., & Van Dyne, L. 2004. The employee-organization relationship: A timely concept in a period of transition. In Martocchio, J. J. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management: 291370. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Shore, L. M., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., Chen, X-P., & Tetrick, L. E. 2009. Social exchange in work settings: Content, process, and mixed models. Management & Organization Review, 5(3): 289302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyne, L., & Ang, S. 1998. Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6): 692703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Teilegen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6): 10631070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeng, M., & Chen, X. P. 2003. Achieving cooperation in multiparty alliances: A social dilemma approach to partnership management. Academy of Management Review, 28(4): 587605.Google Scholar
Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., & Glibkowski, B. C. 2007. The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3): 647680.Google Scholar