Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:31:55.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Foreign-owned Subsidiaries in China Follow a Distinctive Pattern of Technological Knowledge Sourcing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

John A. Cantwell  and
Feng Zhang
John A. Cantwell
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, USA
Feng Zhang
Affiliation:
St. Mary's University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the China-located subsidiaries of foreign-owned multinational corporations (MNCs) for patterns of intra-firm and interorganizational technological knowledge accumulation. We analyze US patents attributed to those subsidiaries between 1996 and 2005 and argue that MNCs have recently tended toward open network structures, enabling subsidiaries in emerging markets to develop technological capabilities by searching for diversified inter-organizational knowledge sources beyond geographically local contexts to compensate for local limitations and deficiencies. Findings show that subsidiaries in China have gradually developed their technological capabilities through non-localized searches beyond their organizational, technological, and geographical boundaries. The study contributes to the literature on MNC organizational restructuring, subsidiary evolution, and subsidiary-level non-localized knowledge searches. The findings also have important implications for knowledge spillovers, MNC knowledge management, and government policies.

Keywords

ChinaMNC subsidiarynon-localized searchtechnological capability中国跨国公司分公司非本地式知识积累科技能力
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 9 , Issue 3: Special Issue Knowledge Search, Spillovers, and Creation in Emerging Markets , November 2013 , pp. 489 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcacer, J., & Gittelman, M. 2006. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4): 774–779.Google Scholar
Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue): 155–165.Google Scholar
Almeida, P., & Phene, A. 2004. Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9): 847–864.Google Scholar
Alvarez, I., & Cantwell, J. A. 2011. International integration and mandates of innovative subsidiaries in Spain. International Journal of Institutions and Economies, 3(3): 415–444.Google Scholar
Andersson, U. 2003. Managing the transfer of capabilities within multinational corporations: The dual role of the subsidiary. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19(4): 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. 2000. In search of centre of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiar roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40: 329–350.Google Scholar
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, U., Bjorkman, L., & Forsgren, M. 2005. Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness. International Business Review, 14(5): 521–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5): 802–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibugi, D. 1992. Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: A review. Science and Public Policy, 19(6): 357–368.Google Scholar
Asmussen, C. G., Pedcrsen, T., & Dhanaraj, C. 2009. Host-country environment and subsidiary competence: Extending the diamond network model. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athreye, S., & Cantwell, J. A. 2007. Creating competition? Globalization and the emergence of new technology producers. Research Policy, 36(2): 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1986. Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Review, 64(6): 87–94.Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3): 207–229.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability evolution and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkinshaw, J., & Pedersen, T. 2009. Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In Rugman, A. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of international business: 367-388. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. 1998. Building firm specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 221–241.Google Scholar
Bruche, G. 2009. A new geography of innovation – China and India rising. Columbia FDI Perspectives, 4(April 2009). [Cited 10 April 2010.] Available from URL: http://www.vcc.columbia.edu Google Scholar
Burgessa, S. M., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. 2006. Marketing renaissance: How research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(4): 337–356.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. A. 1995. The globalization of technology: What remains of the product cycle. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1): 155–174.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. A. 2006. Introduction, The economics of patents. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. A. 2013. Blurred boundaries between firms, and new boundaries within (large multinational) firms: The impact of decentralized networks for innovation. Seoul Journal of Economics, 26(1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. A., & Barrera, M. P. 1998. The localisation of corporate technological trajectories in the interwar cartels: Cooperative learning versus an exchange of knowledge. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 6(2-3): 257–292.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109–1128.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2011. Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3-4): 206–232.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. A., & Noonan, C. A. 2007. Exploring the charateristics of technology spillovers using patent citation data. In Piscitello, L. & Santangelo, G. D. (Eds.), Do multinationals feed local development and growth?: 95–127. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. A., & Piscitello, L. 2007. Attraction and deterrence in the location of foreign-owned R & D activities: The role of positive and negative spillovers. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1(1): 83–111.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. A., & Zhang, F. 2011. Technological complexity and the evolving tructure of MNC subsidiary knowledge accumulation. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 38(4): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. 2006. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R & D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1): 68–82.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3): 35–41.Google Scholar
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: (Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation 1): 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driffield, N., Love, J. H., & Menghinello, S. 2009. The multinational enterprise as a source of international knowledge flows: Direct evidence from Italy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 350–359.Google Scholar
Duguet, E., & Macgarvie, M. 2005. How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Economic Innovation and New Technology, 14(5): 375–393.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 45–66.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 2009. The key literature on IB activities. In Rugman, A. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of international business: 39-71. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H., Fujita, M., & Yakova, N. 2007. Some macro-data on the régionalisation/globalisation debate: A comment on the Rugman/Verbeke analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1): 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, D., & Kim, L. 2002. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31(8-9): 1417–1429.Google Scholar
Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johanson, J. 2005. Managing the embedded mutltinational: A business network view. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Frost, T. S. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 101–123.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, T. S., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Ensign, P. C. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 997–1018.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, S., & Barüett, C. A. 1988. Creation, adoption, and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 365–388.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661–1707.Google Scholar
He, Z., & Wong, P. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4): 481–494.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Li, H., & Worthington, W. J. 2005. Emerging markets as learning laboratories: Learning behaviors of local firms and foreign entrants in different institutional contexts. Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 353–380.Google Scholar
Hobday, M., & Rush, H. 2007. Upgrading the technological capabilities of foreign transnational subsidiaries in developing countries: The case of electronics in Thailand. Research Policy, 36(9): 1335–1356.Google Scholar
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 249–267.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The (Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577–598.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. S. 2000. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. The American Economic Review, 90(2): 215–218.Google Scholar
Katila, R. 2002. New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 995–1010.Google Scholar
Kim, H., Kim, H., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2010. Does market-oriented institutional change in an emerging economy make business-group-affiliated multinationals perform better? An institution-based view. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 1141–1160.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383–397.Google Scholar
Kuemmerle, W. 1999. The drivers of foreign-direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131–150.Google Scholar
Li, J., Chen, D., & Shapiro, D. M. 2010a. Product innovations in emerging economies: The role of foreign knowledge access channels and internal efforts in Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(2): 243–266.Google Scholar
Li, J., Chen, D., & Shapiro, D. M. 2013. FDI spillovers at the national and subnational level: The impact on product innovation by Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 9(3): 413–435.Google Scholar
Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. 2010b. Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (4): 349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Chen, L., & Kittilaksanawong, W. 2013. External knowledge search strategies in China's technology ventures: The role of managerial interpretations and ties. Management and Organization Review, 9(3): 437–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. 2003. Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent subsidiary links shape overseas success. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3): 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. 2005. Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 40(1): 71–90.Google Scholar
Miller, D. J., Fern, M. J., & Cardinal, L. B. 2007. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2): 307–326.Google Scholar
Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
OECD. 2007. OECD reviews of innovation policy – China synthesis report. [Cited 10 April 2010.] Available from URL: http://www.oecd.org/science/innovationinsciencetechnologyandindustry/39177453.pdf. Google Scholar
Pavitt, K. 1988. International patterns of technological accumulation. In Hood, N. & Valline, J.-E. (Eds.), Strategies in global competition: 126-157. New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
People's Daily Online. 2010. China home to 1200 foreign R & D centers. [Cited 10 April 2010.] Available from URL: http://english.pcople.com.cn/90001/90778/90861/6921243.html Google Scholar
Phene, A., & Almeida, P. 2003. How do firms evolve? The patterns of technological evolution of semiconductor subsidiaries. International Business Review, 12(3): 349–367.Google Scholar
Phene, A., & Almeida, P. 2008. Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 901–919.Google Scholar
Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6): 751–766.Google Scholar
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4): 287–306.Google Scholar
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 237–250.Google Scholar
Singh, J. 2007. Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5): 764–786.Google Scholar
Steensma, H. K., Tihanyi, L., Lyles, M. A., & Dhanaraj, C. 2005. The evolving value of foreign partnerships in transitioning economies. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2): 213–235.Google Scholar
Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1): 21–38.Google Scholar
The Ministry of Commerce of China. 2006. The analysis of foreign direct investment in China. [Cited 10 April 2010.] Available from URL: http://anhui.mofcom.gov.cn/column/print.shtml?/sjgongzuody/200608/20060802783165 Google Scholar
UN. 2005. World investment report. [Cited 10 April 2010.] Available from URL: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir2005_en.pdf Google Scholar
Wang, J., Liu, X., & Li, X. 2009. A dual-role typology of multinational subsidiaries. International Business Review, 18(6): 578–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, A. & Wei, J. 2013. Effects of geographic search on product innovation in industrial cluster firms in China. Management and Organization Review, 9(3): 465–487.Google Scholar
Yong, G., & Zhou, H. 2009. Industrial park management in the Chinese environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(14): 1289–1294.Google Scholar
Zander, I. 1998. The evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational corporation – dispersion, duplication and potential advantages from multinationality. Research Policy, 27(1): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M. 2006. Conducting R & D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52(8): 1185–1199.Google Scholar